[cisco-voip] Blocking number when calling?

[Ryan Ratliff]

I believe setting the calling party number to restricted, and sending  
no calling party number are different.   I'm sure different providers  
handle it differently though.

-Ryan

On Jul 7, 2008, at 12:56 PM, Madziarczyk, Jonathan wrote:

Good to know.  I haven’t seen it on our tests yet, but it also seems  
like our Telco is pretty flexible with deciding how to respond and  
present based on different options, so if we see it become an issue I  
believe we can request a change.



JM



From: Sullivan,Gary,GREENWICH,Information Services  
[mailto:Gary.Sullivan at waters.nestle.com]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:54 AM
To: Ryan Ratliff
Cc: Madziarczyk, Jonathan; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Blocking number when calling?



The issue we had with not sending the CLID  on a PRI. If Telco didn't  
see the out going CLID they would send the BTN.

When one of are sale's people would call the competition to get there  
pricing they didn't want any CLID to show up on the other end.



From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 11:27 AM
To: Sullivan,Gary,GREENWICH,Information Services
Cc: Madziarczyk, Jonathan; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Blocking number when calling?

Specifically you either have a route pattern like Gary mentions  
(though I would make it *679.@) or a translation pattern set to drop  
the *67 and let your existing route patterns route the call.  In both  
cases you simply set the calling party number to Restricted to block  
calling number.



-Ryan


On Jul 7, 2008, at 11:02 AM, Sullivan, Gary, GREENWICH, Information  
Services wrote:



We've been using this in our route patterns. 9.*67@ and has been working



From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip- 
bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Madziarczyk, Jonathan
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2008 10:56 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Blocking number when calling?

I’ve got a weird request from a user.  Apparently on their old NEC  
system they were able to block their number from being sent when they  
made specific calls (through a series of key sequences).  Is such a  
thing possible either with the Call Manager or through the regular  
POTS lines (like *69 for redial of last call)?

Thanks

_______________________________________________

cisco-voip mailing list

cisco-voip at puck.nether.net

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080707/903c1a16/attachment.html>