[cisco-voip] E.164 dialing

[Tim Smith]

Hi Ryan...

"Corporate Numbering" is not a private numbering space.. I believe it is
some sort of service, like personal numbering..
http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/oftel/publications/numbering/2003/05nums0303.htm.#3

Have you taken a look at the CUCM SRND? It has some good stuff on dial plans
with site codes etc..

Why make everything E164...?

Cheers,

Tim


On 7/14/08, Ryan O'Connell <Roconnell at unislumin.com> wrote:
>
>  Yes agreed and understood, in fact the plan is based on UC version 7. So
> back to my questions though, with E.164 NANP and E.164 with UK does anyone
> know if there are private numbers reserved? As far as I can see any Area
> code that repeats itself has not been assigned to any NANP number as of yet
> except for 888. They have been set aside as ERC (Easily Recognizable Codes)
> numbers. This being said it doesn't clearly define if these numbers will
> ever be introduced as NANP numbers. So based on this using 444 XXX XXXX in
> NANP we should be safe. As for the UK it seems as though they set aside a
> block for "Corporate Numbering" 05x xxxx xxxx.
>
>
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Ryan
>
>
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Justin Steinberg [mailto:jsteinberg at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, July 14, 2008 7:45 AM
> *To:* Ryan O'Connell
> *Cc:* Matt Slaga (US); cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] E.164 dialing
>
>
>
> I agree with Matt.  so many changes in UC7, I would hold off making any
> significant dialplan changes until that release.
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Ryan O'Connell <Roconnell at unislumin.com>
> wrote:
>
> That's what I'm saying is that I shouldn't need the "+" if the number is a
> fully qualified E.164 number.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matt Slaga (US) [mailto:Matt.Slaga at us.didata.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 14, 2008 6:33 AM
> To: Ryan O'Connell; cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] E.164 dialing
>
> Unfortunately, you are going to have to wait for UCM 7.0 to have full
> E164 support.  Currently UCM throws up when it gets a '+'.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Ryan O'Connell
> Sent: Friday, July 11, 2008 3:54 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck-nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] E.164 dialing
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> I am working on a Dialplan that is based on E.164 numbers. Essentially
> all internal DN's will be the fully qualified E.164 number without the
> "+" so for NANP that will be 11 digits and in Europe it will consist of
> country-code followed by local exchange. Using partitions and CSS's to
> maintain interal 4 digit dialing intra-site and full E.164 inter-site.
> For DID's the above plan is pretty straight forward but for non-DID's I
> can't seem to find any ranges within the NANP that are designated as
> private addresses. So if I want to assign 100 DN's to be voicemail ports
> or lobby phones or whatever I was wondering what I should make these
> numbers so that it doesn't overlap with any PSTN numbers.
>
> If anyone can share thoughts or their experiences in this area that
> would be helpful thanks
>
>
> Ryno
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> -----------------------------------------
> Disclaimer:
>
> This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
> designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
> intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
> this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
> this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
> unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
> notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
> from your computer. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080715/f18c48b8/attachment-0001.html>