[cisco-voip] Mismatched CCM versions, side effects...

[Jonathan Charles]

I ask, cuz my original plan was to apply sr5b to the Subscriber, then
sr7 to the pub, then sr7 to the sub.... I figured it would be safest
to patch the sub to the same ver



Jonathan

On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:25 AM, Jonathan Charles <jonvoip at gmail.com> wrote:
> So, es122 is newer than sr5b....
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:15 AM, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com> wrote:
>> SR5b is based on ES106 with various fixes going up to ES115.
>> The biggest fix between those two versions is  CSCsj37081 - CDP.sys causing
>> nonpaged pool memory leak identified by Mdl tag.
>> Unfortunately you need to be at SR7 to have the full fix for that.
>> The general mismatched version warning I give is:
>> Worst case, CCM crashes, repeatedly.
>> Most likely case, calls fail between the nodes running mismatched versions.
>> Best case, various wierd things happen you can't explain.
>> In any case TAC won't touch the system.
>>
>> -Ryan
>>
>> On Jul 17, 2008, at 11:57 AM, Jonathan Charles wrote:
>> So, just curious as to what potential side effects could be in the
>> following:
>> Publisher CCM 4.1(3)Sr5b
>> Subscriber: CCM 4.1(3)es122.1
>> I am thinking really bad things, but I want the customer to understand
>> how bad...  they are pushing back on patching.... I want rain of fire
>> kind of stuff....
>>
>>
>>
>> Jonathan
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>