[cisco-voip] OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

but the nortel green calculator says Cisco is bad for the environment.

http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/27549

Lelio
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7' 
crossover cable
is not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double dutch leagues.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com>
To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
Cc: "Cisco VOIP Newsletter - puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2008 3:47 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] OT: Any one using Adtran at the access Layer?


> Well, you said all responses...
>
> We just did a Cisco IPT implementation with 3Com switches (customer
> controlled switches completely), and the implementation failed because
> the switches couldn't handle multicast streams... 12 streams killed
> the LAN.
>
> So, I am now a convert... switches made by someone not Cisco? Just
> move along pal...
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Had a Adtran rep come by today and told us all about Adtran switches /
>> routers / appliances / etc and the switches sound good, but I was 
>> wondering
>> if anyone on the list was using them in production with a Cisco CM /
>> network.  All responses welcome.
>>
>> Scott
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>