[cisco-voip] VG224 and SRST

[Jonathan Charles]

You should always go with SCCP for a VG224, otherwise you lose all of
the SCCP supplementary services.



Jonathan

On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 8:02 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> As far as I understand, that is correct. However, I believe that with some
>  work you can get MGCP and H323 working in an SRST environment as well.
>
>  I went with SCCP b/c it was the easiest.
>
>  Lelio
>  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>  Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>  (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>  ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>  Java-Clavis-Domus Theorem: The ability to keep your hands on the home keys
>  is inversely
>  related to the amount of caffeine ingested in the last 30 minutes.
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: "Christopher M. Bomba" <cbomba at s4nets.com>
>  To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>  Sent: Monday, March 17, 2008 6:22 AM
>  Subject: [cisco-voip] VG224 and SRST
>
>
>  > >From what I understand, when dealing with VG224's and SRST is that you
>  > >have
>  > to configure the device as SCCP and add the SRST router as a CCM device in
>  > the SCCP group.  Is that correct?
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Chris
>  >
>  > _______________________________________________
>  > cisco-voip mailing list
>  > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>  >
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  cisco-voip mailing list
>  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>