[cisco-voip] Discard digits question

[Ryan Ratliff]

I think you'll need to test this one to see how it behaves.  Hopefully if
CUCM sees the destination endpoint isn't a 4ESS PRI it will ignore that
setting on the route pattern.
 

-Ryan 

 

  _____  

From: c3voip [mailto:c3voip at nc.rr.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 12:40 PM
To: 'Ryan Ratliff'; 'Jason Burns'
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Discard digits question



I am talking about the ISDN Network-Specific Facilities Information Element
settings on the Route Pattern.

 

We have a need for 4ESS - Software Defined Network Service on one of our
RG's, but I am wanting to use that RG as a backup for a RG that does not
have SDN.  Can I do that somehow?

 

Thanks,

-C

 

 

From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com] 
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 10:23 AM
To: 'c3voip'; 'Jason Burns'
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Discard digits question

 

The PRI protocol type is set on the individual gateways, not at the route
pattern, route list, or route group level.

 

-Ryan 

 

 

  _____  

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of c3voip
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2008 9:47 AM
To: 'Jason Burns'
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Discard digits question

Thanks Jason.  I never thought about it that way.  I knew it could be done.

 

OK, now for my next questions: 

 

What if the 2 RG's require different Network Service Protocols, i.e. 5E8 vs.
4ESS?  If one RP fails can it roll to another and retry the call?

 

Thanks,

-C

 

 

From: Jason Burns [mailto:burns.jason at gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2008 11:00 PM
To: c3voip
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Discard digits question

 

C,

It certainly sounds like that option is the one you should be using. I've
never used it myself though.

You can make this work by changing the pattern to

91.[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX

In the first RG discard predot and prefix 1
In the second RG discard predot.

I trust the manual manipulation over the shortcut commands, especially when
I'm not exactly sure what the shortcuts are supposed to accomplish and what
caveats they might have.

-Jason

On Wed, Nov 12, 2008 at 4:11 PM, c3voip <c3voip at nc.rr.com> wrote:

I currently have a 9.1[2-9]XX[2-9]XXXXXX Route Pattern that I have directed
to a Route List. In the Route Pattern have it set to discard digits "PreDot"
and that works great for the first Route Group in the Route List, but the
problem comes with the second RG.  The second RG only accepts 10 digits
instead of 11.  

 

Shouldn't I be able to set the Discard Digits to "PreDot 11D->10D" on the
Route List Detail Configuration page and only send out 10-digits to this RG?
It is not working that way currently.  Am I thinking about this wrong?

 

Thanks,

-C

 

 


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081113/198a0192/attachment.html>