[cisco-voip] CME Ephone-hunt question

[Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila]

Thx;

Ill keep that in mind

Sent from a Blackberry wireless device


----- Original Message -----
From: Christopher M. Bomba <cbomba at s4nets.com>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Cc: Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila
Sent: Mon Oct 13 09:15:14 2008
Subject: RE: CME Ephone-hunt question

I would not use the dialplan-pattern command on the lab.  It can mess with
so much stuff especially when you need to maybe send calls back out of the
system.  Instead use the voice translations rules on the incoming dial-peer
or the voice-port.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 12:55:38 -0400
From: "Jorge L. Rodriguez Aguila" <jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com>
Subject: [cisco-voip] CME Ephone-hunt question
To: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Message-ID:
        <38192AC07454A04196E4E021D411F9180FB1124527 at exch.Netxar.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

I am doing some labs for my upcoming CCIE lab and noticed that even when I
have a dialplan-pattern statement in place to reduce the number of digits
from 8 to 4 on incoming DNIS, the ephone hunt pilot numbers do not use this.
I have to either do a voice translation rule or put a secondary full e.164
number for it to work. The Lab Racks have CME 3.3. Is this a CME 3.3 bug or
a standard CME feature and if so why does it not get covered under the
dial-pattern sweep.

Jorge Rodr?guez Aguila
CCNA,CCVP,CRMCS,CIPCES
Senior Voice/Data Network Consultant
Netxar Technologies
jorge.rodriguez at netxar.com
Office 787-765-0058
PCS 787-688-8530