[cisco-voip] Added config lines to 3560POE
David Zhars
dzhars at gmail.com
Mon Oct 20 19:46:22 EDT 2008
Thanks everyone! Should I leave those two lines for the port that connects
to my 2801 for SRST?
Thanks again! I thought it looked strange for ports with phones!!
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:34 PM, Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com> wrote:
> Tell your expert he needs to keep current. You shouldn't configure
> switchports as trunks that are connecting to phones.
>
> On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 2:06 PM, David Zhars <dzhars at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I had an "expert" come in last week and fix some minor issues on our
>> network.
>>
>> He added this line to the ports on my 3560POEs. These ports support a
>> phone and PC:
>>
>> switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
>>
>>
>>
>> Any idea why he would have added that line? What does it do? Any harm?
>>
>> On another switch, he added that line and
>>
>> switchport mode dynamic desirable
>>
>>
>> to the ports. Again, these ports (most of them are actually unused, it's a small network) will only have a phone, or at best,
>> a phone with a PC hanging off them.
>>
>>
>>
>> What do you think?
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20081020/f7bebd64/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list