[cisco-voip] IPT QS: CSS and Partitioning

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

I think for the most part people have answered the questions. I just wanted to add to the differences between FACs and CMCs:
  a.. both FACs and CMCs have a "code" portion, this is used when a route pattern is triggered which requires one or the other (or both)
  b.. both FACs and CMCs have a "description" portion but for FACs, the "description" is entered into the CDR and for the CMC the code is entered into the CDR.
  c.. an FAC also has level associated to it, so based on the level it can use particular route patterns
Lelio
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
...seen on a Geek Squad patch cord: "While it is the same length, this 7' crossover cable
is not regulation issue for most competitive Manhattan double dutch leagues.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Syed Khalid Ali 
  To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
  Sent: Wednesday, September 10, 2008 12:17 AM
  Subject: [cisco-voip] IPT QS: CSS and Partitioning


  All,

  I was reading CCM fundamentals 2nd edition and got confused on the following verdicts:

  Partitions divide the set of all route patterns into subsets of equally reachable destinations. Equally reachable means that a user who can call any single member of the subset can call all members of the subset.

  Then in subsequent paragraph the author says:

  A partition is an attribute of an address. It belongs to called entities; it has no bearing on who a device can call. Membership in a partition does not automatically mean that a device can call other devices in the partition. The list of partitions in a device's calling search space is the sole dictator of who it can call.

  Further,if we add devices to partitions other than NONE, the NONE partition device loose access to other device. Is this the case in opposite direction, that is visibility of route patterns in NONE partition to devices in partition other than NONE.

  What is the difference b/w Force Authorization Code and Client Matter Codes. What I understood that CMC allow the ability for biliing and logging in CDR.

  Need Clarification!

  Regards,
  Khalid


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Explore the seven wonders of the world Learn more! 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  cisco-voip mailing list
  cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
  https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20080910/5c9687f0/attachment.html>