[cisco-voip] Polycom Video integrated to Cisco
Malcolm Caldwell
malcolm.caldwell at cdu.edu.au
Thu Sep 11 19:38:19 EDT 2008
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 11:19 -0500, Robert Kulagowski wrote:
> Justin Steinberg wrote:
> > I'm still trying to find my way out of the maze. that document is very
> > confusing to me, problably the same thing that is confusing you and that
> > is why do we need secondary numbers. No where does it explain the
> > purpose of those numbers. A little theory before the application here
> > would go a long way.....
> >
> > I am going to stick with TDM switching with the Polycom connected via
> > PRI to the same ISR that terminates the CO ISDN circuits.
>
> I'm still working my way through this new feature. I've got a TAC case
> open (Polycom's are still only making 128K calls, and often no video),
> but still no "cook book" explanation for how this is supposed to work,
> or if it even makes sense.
>
> With a Polycom HDX 4002 at a site and a Codian 3241 PRI gateway, I can
> use the built-in GK in the Codian, and register prefixes "1" and "011".
> The endpoints register to the Codian and can dial "normally" (no user
> training required).
>
> Even if I get this feature to work on the 2851, it seems like I'm still
> stuck because 12.4(20)T doesn't have a built-in GK featureset option, so
> the endpoints can't register to the 2851; I would need the IP address of
> the 2851 in the dial field on the Polycom, and the actual phone number
> that I want to dial in the "extension" field, which is awkward.
>
> Latest IOS that seems to have the GK functionality is 12.4(2)T, and that
> one wouldn't have the channel bonding feature...
>
> Thoughts?
The obvious solution is to find another gatekeeper.
For example a fairly low end server can handle a lot of calls running
something like gnugk http://www.gnugk.org/
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list