[cisco-voip] silly question - dual integration..

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Sweet. Thanks Pat! I'll test that out by dialing in from the PBX and try to connect to another subscriber. It should go out the PBX trunks if that's true. 

I'll fool around with the trunk to see if that gives me what I'm looking for. Basically, I'd like to see if we can get additional caller ID information to the phones that we lose when we go out the CCM integration and over T1s back to the PBX. 


--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pat Hayes" <pat-cv at wcyv.com> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 5:39:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] silly question - dual integration.. 

UC cannot bridge calls across integrations, transfers go out on the 
same integration that the call came in on. However, you can configure 
a trunk access code in UC, under telephony integrations. With that 
configured, if you call in from one integration and try to xfer to a 
user on another, UC will pre-pend the access code to the transfer 
string. 

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 4:17 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 
> OK - spoke too soon. Even when I change the telephone switch associated to 
> the user (PBX) it still goes out the CallManager ports. 
> 
> Any thoughts? 
> 
> 
> --- 
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
> To: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:09:52 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] silly question - dual integration.. 
> 
> Never mind, I see that a user can be associated with a phone system. 
> 
> --- 
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
> To: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
> Sent: Monday, April 20, 2009 2:07:38 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> Subject: [cisco-voip] silly question - dual integration.. 
> 
> OK, silly question....if I have a Unity Connection dual integration, what 
> integration does the auto-attendant call handler try to send calls out? 
> 
> --- 
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090420/2adf9bbb/attachment.html>