[cisco-voip] SRST "counts"

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Interesting. Thanks. So if I have a bunch of FXS ports, either SCCP or H323, it will not using up an SRST peg count? Because it has it's own dial-peer? 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jonathan Charles" <jonvoip at gmail.com> 
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca> 
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:09:09 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] SRST "counts" 

Registered EFXS devices... so, POTS dial peers connected to a physical 
port do not, but VG224 ports registered as ephones do; ATAs do, FXOs 
do not, 79XX's do... etc... 

Same with max DN... if it doesn't generate an ephone DN, it doesn't count. 



Jonathan 

On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:05 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote: 
> Just wondering what counts towards an SRST peg count when it talks about the 
> max SRST sessions per router? I'm guessing that IP phones obviously count 
> toward this, how about VG224s (SCCP), and FXS and FXO ports? How about 
> MGCP/H323 PRI ports? 
> 
> 
> 
> --- 
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
> 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091217/376fe7cd/attachment.html>