[cisco-voip] CM / Unity SIP integration

[Pat Hayes]

The SCCP integration has been around in Unity since....ever, and had
most of the bugs worked out (ok, it is at least 'fairly stable' :-) ),
whereas the SIP integration to CCM is still relatively new. Limitation
wise, as I recall, you can't do Unity failover with SIP trunks, but
that may have changed. Not sure if there is anything else.

For me, this is similar to the question of, whether to use SIP or SCCP
loads on your phones. It is great that SIP is an option, but given
limited deployments relative to SCCP, and lack of some features, what
is the real argument in favor?

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:47 PM,  <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> I've heard SIP is the way to go if you can.
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
> Computing & Communications
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x56354
>
> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>
> [XKJ2000]
>
> On Feb 11, 2009, at 8:37 PM, "Carter, Bill" <bcarter at sentinel.com> wrote:
>
>> Just a general questions. From a functional and reliability standpoint,
>> any reason not to do SIP integrations over SCCP with CM 6.X and Unity 5/7
>> integrations?
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>