[cisco-voip] Translation pattern in CUCM6.1

Jacky Cai jackycxh at gmail.com
Thu Jan 8 23:45:53 EST 2009


Yes. the service parameters can only prefix digits to caller ID but can not
insert digits mid-string. So I am wondering if I can do this by some
translation pattern?

2009/1/7 Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>

> Agreed, this is a bit strange.
> Normally you can use the CCM service parameters to prefix digits to inbound
> calls (Advanced parameters, search for prefix).  Those parameters are very
> dumb though and can't insert digits mid-string.
>
>  -Ryan
>
>  On Jan 7, 2009, at 10:11 AM, Justin Steinberg wrote:
>
> are you doing this so that people can use their missed/received/placed call
> lists ?     if so, perhaps you could deal with this on the outbound call.
> create a route pattern
> 9.!
> predot discard
> prefix 90
>
> Also, I'm just curious, your telco is prefixing a 9 to each inbound call?
>  this seems weird, especially if you are in a region where you need to
> return the call prefixed with 0.
>
> Justin
>
> On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:54 AM, Jacky Cai <jackycxh at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It is incoming call from PSTN thru a MGCP gateway. only one CSS can be
>> assigned to the MGCP gateway. If I create more then one translation
>> pattern in this CSS. These translation patterns is nothing regard the
>> called ID, but only manipulate the caller ID. then how Call manager can
>> decide to use which translation pattern? How can we let call manager to
>> select the correct translation pattern for the call?
>> example: two calls, the caller ID are 91234567 and 912345678 both call
>> to an extension 555. I create two Translation pattern(the calling party
>> number mask is XXXXXXX and XXXXXXXX and put them to the CSS of mgcp
>> gateway.  How can we let call manager use the translation pattern
>> (XXXXXXX) for 91234567 and (XXXXXXXX) for 912345678?
>>
>> Thanks a lot.
>> 在 2009-01-07三的 14:35 +0200,Ahmed Elnagar写道:
>>  >
>> > If the calling number is a specific 2 or 3 pattern "say 4 digits and 5
>> > digits" you could replicate your dial-plan to have one set per calling
>> > number pattern and each number pattern has its CSS and PT to hit the
>> > required route pattern which has the correct transaltion for this
>> > calling number...however this could be a little bit complicated but
>> > you could have it as a last resort solution.
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ahmed Elnagar
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> > Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 13:04:34 +0800
>> > From: jackycxh at gmail.com
>> > To: ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com
>> > Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Translation pattern in CUCM6.1
>> > CC: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >
>> > Thanks. but the problem is that the calling number is not fixed
>> > length and can not use a mask to drop the first digit.
>> >
>> > 2009/1/7 Ahmed Elnagar <ahmed_elnagar at hotmail.com>
>> >
>> >         Provided that the first digit is fixed you could make it on
>> >         the calling party transforamtion on the route pattern or the
>> >         route list "if using" by making a mask to remove first digit
>> >         only...if the calling number is 90108899 use a mask of xxxxxx
>> >         this will result in 0108899 then prefix two digits one is the
>> >         first digit and the second is the one you want to add...so if
>> >         the digit you want to insert is 0...prefix 90 so the number
>> >         will be 900108899
>> >
>> >
>> >         Thanks,
>> >         Ahmed Elnagar
>> >
>> >         ______________________________________________________________
>> >         Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:07:19 +0800
>> >         From: jackycxh at gmail.com
>> >         To: TimothyEstes at spherion.com; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> >         Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Translation pattern in CUCM6.1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         Yes. that's the case. but unforturnally I am using
>> >         MGCP... :-(. Any idea on the CUCM side?
>> >
>> >         Thanks a lot.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         2009/1/7 Jacky Cai <jackycxh at gmail.com>
>> >                 Yes. that's the case. but unforturnally I am using
>> >                 MGCP... :-(. Any idea on the CUCM side?
>> >
>> >                 Thanks a lot.
>> >
>> >
>> >                 2009/1/7 Estes, Timothy <TimothyEstes at spherion.com>
>> >
>> >
>> >                         If you have H.323 gateways the following
>> >                         config will work. Basically if the number is
>> >                         in the local area code we translate the
>> >                         calling number to 9XXXXXXXXXX. If the number
>> >                         is not in the local area code its becomes
>> >                         91XXXXXXXXXX. This makes the caller ID display
>> >                         on the phone show the correct dialable pattern
>> >                         for call-back purposes.
>> >
>> >                         The following basic config on a 323 GW should
>> >                         work for the Ft. Lauderdale area where 954 and
>> >                         754 are the local overlay area codes.
>> >
>> >
>> >                         voice translation-profile TP1
>> >                          translate calling 1
>> >
>> >                         voice translation-rule 1
>> >                          rule 1 /^\(954[2-9]......\)/ /9\1/
>> >                          rule 2 /^\(754[2-9]......\)/ /9\1/
>> >                          rule 3 /^\([2-9]..[2-9]....../)\ \91\1/
>> >
>> >                         dial-peer voice 101 pots
>> >                         description PSTN - PRI
>> >                         translation-profile incoming TP1
>> >                         direct-inward-dial
>> >                         port 0/0/1:23
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                         Timothy Estes
>> >                         Affiliated Computer Services (ACS) @ Spherion
>> >                         Ft. Lauderdale FL
>> >                         timothyestes at spherion.com
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                         ______________________________________________
>> >                         From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
>> >                         [cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf
>> >                         Of Jacky Cai [jackycxh at gmail.com]
>> >                         Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 9:57 PM
>> >                         To: cisco-voip at puck-nether.net List
>> >                         Subject: [cisco-voip] Translation pattern in
>> >                         CUCM6.1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >                         Hi,
>> >
>> >                         In CUCM 6.1, do you have any idea on how to
>> >                         add a digit to calling party number just after
>> >                         the first digits?
>> >
>> >                         For example: translate the calling party
>> >                         number from 9! to 90!.
>> >
>> >                         Thanks.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         ______________________________________________________________
>> >         Get news, entertainment and everything you care about at
>> >         Live.com. Check it out!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > ______________________________________________________________________
>> > Add maps and directions to your party Show them the way!
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090109/eb8688a3/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list