[cisco-voip] Mobility (Single Number Reach) - Internal calls
Ryan Ratliff
rratliff at cisco.com
Tue Jan 13 10:35:21 EST 2009
Assuming 1XXX matches your calling party number then it should be
applying it. Make sure you've reset devices since configuring and
then you just need to look at the traces to see what's going on.
Also, make sure you applied the 5185551XXX as the calling party
transform mask and did not check "use calling party's external phone
number mask".
-Ryan
On Jan 13, 2009, at 10:29 AM, Mike Wilusz wrote:
Ryan,
Do you have any pointers on using transformation patterns? I’ve been
through the help (which gives obvious explanations of what each field
means), but can’t get it to work. I created a MOBILITY-PT and
MOBILITY-CSS, assign the transformation pattern 1XXX to it to
translate to 5185551XXX. Applied this to the remote destination
profile but we’re still seeing 4 digits pass to the mobile phones.
Any tips?
Mike Wilusz, CCNA
Networking Systems Programmer
Price Chopper Supermarkets / The Golub Corporation
<image.jpg>
From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 10:02:29 -0500
To: "Biffle, Gerrad" <Gerrad.Biffle at greensboro-nc.gov>
Cc: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobility (Single Number Reach) - Internal
calls
Look into using transformation masks to expand the calling party
number. Remember to set the transformation CSS on the remote
destination profile so that they can be applied.
-Ryan
On Jan 12, 2009, at 9:56 PM, Biffle, Gerrad wrote:
We upgraded from 4.1(3) to 6.1(2) last weekend. Prior to this
weekend we’ve been running a Mobility Manager server for our Single
Number Reach and both internal and external calls would show as 10
digit numbers on the cellular devices. Since the upgrade and now
that this function has been moved to CUCM – we only receive the last
4 digits on calls from internal numbers – external numbers still show
10 digits.
Nothing has changed as far as route patterns, etc. – and I’ve looked
everywhere I know to look.
Any ideas on what I might be missing?
Thanks for the help!
=======================================================
Please note that email sent to and from this address is subject
to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to
third parties.
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090113/1b92ad46/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list