[cisco-voip] trace settings for appliances

[Wes Sisk]

detailed should be fine, just keep an eye on iowait.
5.x was very bad for generating too much trace especially where SIP 
+detailed tracing was involved.  not such a good idea there.

/wes

On Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:07:13 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi 
<lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
> These things ship with 150Gb drives now....I'm setting the number of 
> files and size up significantly.
>
> KAPOW!
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Gerrad Biffle" <Gerrad.Biffle at greensboro-nc.gov>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>, "cisco-voip voyp list" 
> <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 3:05:25 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] trace settings for appliances
>
> I’ve always left mine set to “detailed”.  It does shorten the window 
> you have to pull the traces if needed – but at the detailed info will 
> be there (vs. arbitrary).  I’ll be interested to see what others say.  
> Now that we’re on 6.1 – I may have to rethink leaving them on detailed 
> all of the time.
>
>  
>
> Gerrad
>
>  
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net 
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Wednesday, January 14, 2009 2:59 PM
> *To:* cisco-voip voyp list
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] trace settings for appliances
>
>  
>
> My colleague reminds me that we actually have our traces set to 
> detailed. I wonder if this is possible without melting the machines.
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> To: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 12:29:42 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: trace settings for appliances
>
> We've typically left trace set to arbitrary on our CCM 4.1 servers so 
> we can actually find them useful, otherwise, if we have to set it 
> after the fact, we can't find the problem.
>
> We have had no problem whatsoever, likely do to the size of the 
> servers and the load, we're using 7845s with about 1500 phones 
> registered to each server.
>
> Anyone have any experience leaving the trace settings on arbitrary on 
> the appliances? I know that you need to use RTMT to collect things, 
> but I'm wondering if the server itself stores them for a while as 
> well. Obviously downloading them causes some strain, but again, 
> they're not busy.
>
> Thoughts?
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
>
>
> =======================================================
> Please note that email sent to and from this address is subject 
> to the North Carolina Public Records Law and may be disclosed to 
> third parties.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>   

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090114/2957d27c/attachment.html>