[cisco-voip] VIC2-1MFT-G703 and VIC2-1MFT-T1/E1

Sat Jul 25 21:12:31 EDT 2009

Every time I see the G703 the handoff from telco is also
BNC/Coax....maybe that is the definition of unbalanced!!  I recall being
able to get BNC to RJ45 adapter.

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Tim Smith
Sent: Saturday, July 25, 2009 6:02 AM
To: Syed Khalid Ali
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VIC2-1MFT-G703 and VIC2-1MFT-T1/E1

What type of circuit are you trying to connect to?

Key difference as you stated is the ability to do unframed on G703
cards.

The G703 cards also support being configured the same as the T1/E1
cards.. so they have added flexibility in that regard, and if you are
unsure of your circuit you can buy the G703 cards to hedge your bets!

Cheers,

Tim.

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 8:23 PM, Syed Khalid Ali
<syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com> wrote:

No G703 card still need a modem. What I understood that in case of T1
there is no need of an external CSU/DSU. with E1 it still requires an
E1 modem

By unframed means that the whole 2.04mb can be used; that is all time
slots are available.

G703 are not EOS/EOL

On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Moataz Mamdouh<moataz_mmdh at yahoo.com>
wrote:
>
> so u mean that G.703 card doesn 't need a modem , the Teleco Cable
will be
> directly connected to the router.
>
> what do u mean about unframed ? u don't have the time slot command
under the
> controller !!!
> i can't see any difference between both cards ( is G.703 card are EOS
? ) as
> they are supported only on 26xx and 36xx not ISR.
>
> --- On Fri, 7/24/09, Syed Khalid Ali <syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> From: Syed Khalid Ali <syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] VIC2-1MFT-G703 and VIC2-1MFT-T1/E1
> To: "Moataz Mamdouh" <moataz_mmdh at yahoo.com>,
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Date: Friday, July 24, 2009, 5:07 AM
>
> After reading the data sheets I was able to put out theses
> differences. Can any one validate!
>
> MFT-T1/E1 does framed E1 (31 timeslots @ 64 Kbps) and fractional (n<31
> timeslots @ 64 Kbps) and T1 support.
> MFT-G703 additionally does unframed (2048 Kbps) and no T1 support.
> Both support the dedicated echo cancellation daughter module EC-MFT-32
or
> 64.
> With MFT-T1/E1 there is no need for external CSU/DSU when used as a T1
> module.
> Drop and Insert capability.
> Supported in 1841 and higher ISR series routers.
> Supported with 2600, 2600XM, 2691, 3660, 3700 and higher models.
>
> The NM-xCE1T1-PRI does not support dedicated echo-cancellation card.
> Supports with framed and unframed E1 signaling no need for another
G.703
> card.
> No Multiflex operation.
> Compatible with supported V.92 modems.
> Supports (native) termination of balanced (coaxial) cable.
> Simultaneous support of T1 and E1 operation on the same NM-module.
> Supported in 2600XM and onwards.
> Online insertion and removal (OIR) supported on Cisco 3660, 3745 and
> 3845 routers.
> On-board expansion slot for future usage.
>
> One thing that still confuses me that in case of VWIC2-2MFT-T1/E1 can
> one port act as a T1 and other as E1.
>
> Any other thing that someone wants to add!!!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Moataz Mamdouh<moataz_mmdh at yahoo.com>
> wrote:
>> I am not sure but i think they are the same , because G.703 is ITU
>> standard
>> for voice and data over T1 and E1
>>
>>
>> --- On Thu, 7/23/09, Syed Khalid Ali
<syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> From: Syed Khalid Ali <syed.khalid.khursheed at gmail.com>
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] VIC2-1MFT-G703 and VIC2-1MFT-T1/E1
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 12:59 PM
>>
>> what is the difference between G.703 and T1/E1 card beside support
for
>> T1 in later one?
>> Also how can we compare these with NM-1CE1T1-PR. any thing special to
>> consider before going to ordering???
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>> Syed Khalid Ali
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Syed Khalid Ali
>
>

--

Thanks,
Syed Khalid Ali
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090725/c642414a/attachment.html>