[cisco-voip] using Nagios to monitor MCS servers

[Abebe Amare]

If using third party tools is not recommended, what is Cisco's recommended
way to monitor the performance (CPU, memory, paging) utilization of these
servers? We chose nagios because it is free and easy to use.

regards,

Abebe A.

On Fri, Jun 12, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Fuermann, Jason <JBF005 at shsu.edu> wrote:

>  Would you mind elaborating on the issues? I wouldn’t think snmp gets
> every few minutes would be that big an issue (at least compared to a single
> get). Of course, I could also see a single get spiking the cpu and causing a
> code yellow, I just wouldn’t expect it. Just curious cause we are using snmp
> to monitor our cluster.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Wes Sisk
> *Sent:* Friday, June 12, 2009 9:09 AM
> *To:* abuch
> *Cc:* cisco voip
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] using Nagios to monitor MCS servers
>
>
>
> It is possible but I would caution you to take careful inventory of
> functionality and alarms before and after implementing nagios.  we have seen
> numerous service impacting issues caused by monitoring tools.
>
> Regards,
> Wes
>
> On Friday, June 12, 2009 2:59:03 AM, abuch <abucho at gmail.com><abucho at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>  Dear,
>
> What do you thinks of using Nagios to monitor performance utilization of
> Cisco MCS servers running windows 2003 like UCCX, WFO QM and Unity?
>
> regards,
>
> Abebe Amare
>
> System Engineer, VivaCell
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> cisco-voip mailing list
>
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090612/1d4ed178/attachment.html>