[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

[Damien Ball]

Ryan, you da man!  I applied the CSS to the gateway, and it worked just fine.  Thanks!


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Cc: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 9:36:09 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

The device/line partition and routing CSS should play no role in this  
at all.  Only the calling party transform mask, its partition, and  
the transformation CSS on the gateway.

-Ryan

On May 4, 2009, at 9:25 AM, Damien Ball wrote:

Yes.  Both the phone and extension i'm using for 1023 are assigned to  
the All_Internal Partition which is part of the System_LD CSS.  Do  
you think having them on the same partition and CSS (the call routing  
functions and CP transform mask) could be interfering?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan Ratliff" <rratliff at cisco.com>
To: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Cc: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2009 9:21:52 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

Is the 102X calling party transform mask in a partition assigned to
the System_LD CSS?  I believe the docs recommend using separate
partitions and CSS' for transformations that are not shared with call
routing functions.

-Ryan

On May 4, 2009, at 9:00 AM, Damien Ball wrote:

So I'm trying to use calling party transformation patterns to do the
masking I need.  I can't get the mask to apply though.  I made sure
Device Calling Party Transforms are allowed, and I've setup a calling
party transform for 102X (my phone is 1023).  The CSS I chose was
System_LD (which is assigned to the phone and the Device Pool's
Calling Party Transform CSS).  Is there any step that i'm missing?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
To: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 11:39:41 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

I didn't really want to manage them by this means.  If i'm going to
do that, I could just leave it setup the way it is.  That would be
easier.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>
To: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 11:00:25 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

How about setting the external phone number mask on all the phones to
the external number you want people to call back in on? Then on the
single route pattern or local route group you can specify to use the
external phone number mask?

Chris Ward

From: Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:52:26 -0400 (EDT)
To: Chris Ward <chrward at cisco.com>
Cc: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

Yeah, I don't think that will work.  From what I understand of local
route groups, you can take advantage of having a single route list
and a single set of route patterns.  You define which route group to
use in the device pool (this is specific to call manager 7).  So, if
i set the masking on the pattern, I still have the same problem of
not being able to set multiple masks for different groups of phones
easily.  The only way I can see to do it is to set a mask on each
individual phone.  I don't want to do that.  If this doesn't pan out,
I'll have to go back to the traditional way of doing route groups.
Any other suggestions?


----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Ward" <chrward at cisco.com>
To: "Damien Ball" <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 1, 2009 10:44:48 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

Re: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID Hi Damien,

It sounds like you want to be masking the calling party at the route
pattern level with no modification at the route list level. I think I
might not be understanding you exact scenario and goal, but that’s
what it sounds like.

Chris Ward

From: Damien Ball <balld at gcs.k12.nc.us>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 10:15:10 -0400 (EDT)
To: <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [cisco-voip] Local Route Groups without DID

I'm looking at using local route groups with my call system.  I am
currently masking the calling party information at the Route List.
The reason for this is that I'm not mapping DIDs to individual
phones, but I have all calls from a specific site masked as one
telephone number (which dials back into the receptionist or UC call
handler).  If i'm using one global route list, is there a way to
preserve this configuration or is it a lost cause?  I'm using Call
manager 7.0.2 and Unity Connection 7.0.2.  I am routing these calls
through 2 PRIs (each in different calling areas with different
providers).



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing
list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/
listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip