[cisco-voip] "The Call Cannot Completed as Dialed"
Tim Smith
thsglobal at gmail.com
Wed May 6 07:06:45 EDT 2009
Yes Dialled Number Analyser = DNA. You originally asked for debugging steps
to take. DNA is a good one to start with. It does more than check calling
rights. Its worth checking out for yourself.
I suppose it is relatively simple, in a small setup. But it can be more
complicated than that with line / device CSS's applied, translation
patterns, route patterns etc. It depends on the complexity of the system and
how well it has been set up.
If it's been working for 1 year.. have you or someone else made any changes?
This is going to be a good place to start.
You didnt mention your version. Did you rename a partition or something?
Are your DN's in the same partition? Can you call the other way?
IPVMS is the service that runs the Annunciator. Annunciator is the feature
that plays the message to the user saying the call cannot be completed as
dialled. I dont think this would ever kick in for a codec mismatch. Codec
mismatch would end up with the call just dropping after the other party
picked up.. and usually callers then hear fast busy.
Is this only affecting 2 x specific phones?
Cheers,
Tim.
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Anthony Kouloglou <akoul at dataways.gr> wrote:
> You are talking about Dialed Network Analyzer?
> Does this check anything else than calling rights? (such as Calling search
> space and partitions?)
> Can it check if it is ok to call due to codecs that are not supported?
> Otherwise, a call between two DNs that exist on the same CUCM is a very
> easy operation to check!
> No Route Lists, no Line Groups, no Translation Patterns.
> Check parition of DN of phone B.
> Check if CSS of DN A includes this partition.
> That's all!!
> I guess, there is nothing else to check.
>
> Besides, if i got "Insufficient BW" i would know that it has something to
> do with the location BW.
> But not this case again1
>
> Thanks,
> Anthony
>
> Tim Smith wrote:
>
> Have you tried DNA to check CCM thinks the call should actually be allowed?
>
> It's always a good first step if you get a message like that. It will
> give you a good picture of what is supposed to be happening.
>
> If you havent used it before, maybe it is not installed / activated.
> You didnt mention your version. For 4.x you install on your pub from plugin
> page. If 5.x and above you just need to ensure DNA is activated from
> ccmservice page.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Tim
>
> On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Anthony Kouloglou <akoul at dataways.gr>wrote:
>
>> I am getting this message when: phone A calls phone B and vice versa
>> (suddenly today after 1 year that it has been working!!)
>>
>> phone A in the hub location
>> phone B in a location with 500kbps BW to hub
>>
>> Phone A can access the web page of B and ping it.
>> B is normally registered to the same publisher CUCM!!
>> B is behind a router that does not do NAT or firewalling.
>>
>> Why is this prompt playing?
>> I resunched the location BW but i guess that is not the issue.
>> What debugging could show me what is wrong?
>>
>> Thanks and Kind Regards
>> Anthony
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090506/fe783228/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list