[cisco-voip] Phones on VGE cannot dial Out

Wed May 13 23:36:53 EDT 2009

Hi All

I found the Problem .. While Configuring the MGCP gateway for VGE there are
some parameters for teh Port Information in CCM Admin page:

There is a placeholder ofr Number Digits : it should be 0.

Sorry for creating the confusion..

Cheers & Thanks for the support..

Gin

On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:00 PM, Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> I think this is a good idea. I'm not sure how much those intial signup
> emails from the listserv can be customized however....
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jim Reed <jreed at swiftnews.com>
> To: Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>; Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com>;
> ccieid1ot <ccieid1ot at gmail.com>
> Cc: "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:46:05 PM
>  Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones on VGE cannot dial Out
>
> I know Puck sends out an initial eMail when you first sign up.  How about
> having some guidelines in nice, big, bold letters in that confirmation
> eMail.  If people don’t pay attention to them, then there isn’t really much
> one can do about it.  I see logic in both sides of the argument so let’s see
> if we can’t inhibit as much of that as we can in the future by setting up a
> set of guidelines and making sure that the initial sign on confirmation
> relays that information to the user.
>
> Just a thought...
> --
> Jim Reed
> Swift Communications, Inc.
> 970-683-5646 (Direct)
> 775-772-7666 (Cell)
>
>
>
> On 5/13/09 7:39 PM, "Paul" <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> It might have been out of line but I think that people posting to Puck with
> no details about their setup, no hints about what sort of troubleshooting
> measures they've taken themselves, and expecting people to wave a magic wand
> and fix their woes is inconsiderate and reeks of laziness. If someone
> doesn't *know* about any of these technical details and they're open about
> that, I'm fine with that because it's something that can't be helped. I've
> seen way too many posts as of late stating something to the matter of, "I
> made a call and it didn't go through. How do I fix it?" If someone doesn't
> want to give any details and ask something silly like that, they should go
> to TAC first and not Puck. It's silly and wastes everybody's time including
> the original poster's.
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com>
> To: ccieid1ot <ccieid1ot at gmail.com>
> Cc: Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 9:33:16 PM
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phones on VGE cannot dial Out
>
>
> It was Paul's I thought was out of line, not Lelio's.  And let's not debate
> your point of sending private messages, as you violated your own request
> about privately messaging people you disagree with.  We could go on and on
> filling up everyone's email with jibbersish about who was right or wrong,
> but ultimately point was let's stick to technology.   People send messages
> with list ettiquette suggestions all the time.  My email should have been
> considered nothing more, nor nothing less.
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 7:53 PM, ccieid1ot <ccieid1ot at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> How about sending your message privately if you think Lelio's reply
> was out of line.  I certainly didn't.
>
>
> On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:49 PM, Bill Talley <btalley at gmail.com> wrote:
> > <soapbox>
> >
> > What I'll never understand is why people don't just ignore emails like
> Gin's
> > or respond in the manner that Leo did.  I'm sure no one on this list is
> an
> > expert at every situation they encounter and knows exactly what questions
> to
> > ask or information to provide.  At least I'm not anyway.  If there's not
> > enough infomation, please ask for more, or please let it pass.
> >
> > Granted, this is in IPT list for IPT related issues for IPT users, but
> come
> > on it's not a list for ridiculing or belittling people.  At least it
> wasn't
> > when I started following it.
> > </soapbox>
> > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Paul <asobihoudai at yahoo.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Gee. That's nice. Would you like me to help you wipe your nose too?
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: gin Murray <kinusca at gmail.com>
> >> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> Sent: Wednesday, May 13, 2009 6:08:40 PM
> >> Subject: [cisco-voip] Phones on VGE cannot dial Out
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> i have connected Analog phones to the VGE 224 and the Phones are not
> able
> >> to dial out. When It goes off-hook the user gets a busy tone.
> >>
> >> Port config:
> >>
> >> !
> >> voice-port 2/0
> >> !
> >>
> >> However incoming calls are working!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-voip mailing list
> >> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-voip mailing list
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090513/333665ed/attachment.html>