[cisco-voip] Caller ID on 2811

[Paul]

Using Big Daddy isn't for everyone and there may be internal technical policies that drive the use of MGCP.


----- Original Message ----
From: Voice Noob <voicenoob at gmail.com>
To: Chris Ward (chrward) <chrward at cisco.com>; Go0se <me at go0se.com>; Robert Singleton <rsingleton at morsco.com>; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:37:33 PM
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID on 2811

So why not just use H.323?

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Ward
(chrward)
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 3:22 PM
To: Go0se; Robert Singleton; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID on 2811

Right, this has to do with the version of MGCP CUCM supports which is
0.1. MGCP 1.0 supports this however CUCM has not made the switch yet...

-Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: Go0se [mailto:me at go0se.com] 
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 4:10 PM
To: Chris Ward (chrward); 'Robert Singleton'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Caller ID on 2811

This kills me... "technically" Caller ID is now supported on FXO in
MGCP,
however per the release notes it "is not supported in Cisco Unified
Communications Manager Release 7.0 or earlier"... so basically the card
supports it but there isn't a voice application that does. (This is
called
"Putting the cart before the horse") 

See notes here:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_4t/release/notes/124TNEWF.html#wp
2039
194

-Go0se
http://atc.go0se.com

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Chris Ward
(chrward)
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 2:14 PM
To: Robert Singleton; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Caller ID on 2811

Hi Robert,

The restriction I am aware is that MGCP controlled FXO ports don't
support callerID. H323 FXO ports can. I don't think there is any
specific restriction from the 2811 platform.

HTH

-Chris


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert
Singleton
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 3:09 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Caller ID on 2811

In another thread, Wes Sisk wrote:

> You can disable the reception of callerid and have the 
> call routed immediately but then you would not receive callerid.

I don't appear to get CallerID anyway...

Actually, I opened a TAC case on this a long time ago. Apparently, the 
hardware combination of 2811 and VIC2-4FXO doesn't handle CallerID 
somehow. I think the phrase "ISDN backhaul" came up in the conversation,

but it's been a long time. I don't remember the details. I think FXO 
ports on an NM-HDA support the backhaul, but not the HWIC.

Always willing to get a 2nd opinion, because I have 20-someodd locations

that would like to have CallerID. Heck, I'd like to have it because 
troubleshooting an incoming call is much easier if you can find the 
number in CDR instead of depending on the user to note the time 
accurately enough. It's hard enough getting them to nail down the DAY it

happened...

Robert


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip