[cisco-voip] Calling party transformation?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

You're on the right track. Just remember that the mask can be overwritten by subsequent processing steps. From what I recall: 

DN 
route pattern (or translation whichever comes first) 
route group 
route list 

So, by the sounds of it, if your RL/RG is set to use default, it's taking it from either the phone or the route patterns. 

Either way, if you set a route pattern to match the target called number exactly, then set the external calling mask on that route pattern, anyone that calls that number will have their mask changed accordingly. 



--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Edward Countryman" <Edward.Countryman at provena.org> 
To: "Cisco VOIP" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Monday, May 18, 2009 5:47:06 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: [cisco-voip] Calling party transformation? 




I need to modify the calling number sent to the CO whenever one particular outside number is dialed from one of my sites. The sites doesn’t have DID but this outside service needs to see a unique calling number. My thought was to use TRANFORM masks for this but I don’t seem to be able to get this to work. My RL-RG setting for “use external mask” is set to “default”. 



Any thoughts on what I am missing? 
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090518/95598431/attachment.html>