[cisco-voip] Local Route Groups and Call Forwarding

[Ryan Ratliff]

It's not an LRG issue as much as your dialplan not taking this situation into account.  You can use called party transformations to manipulate digits all kinds of ways.  For example on your New York gateway you have a transformation pattern that says if the called party number is 10 digits but doesn't start with 212, prefix a 1 onto it.

You could also use toll bypass and let all calls to the Atlanta numbers route as 10 digit calls via your Atlanta gateway.

-Ryan

On Nov 18, 2009, at 11:18 AM, Nick Marus wrote:

When using local route groups (lrg) with call forwarding. CM7.13 seems to send the forwarded call out the originating device and likewise screws up local/longdistance dialing.

Example, user A in atlanta has phone forwarded to 10 digit local (9+10) number. call forward css utilizes local route groups. user B in newyork, calls user A, and the call attempts to dial out the ny gateway (9+10). It fails as the 10 digit number is not dialable from ny and would need to be 11.

Is there a way around this? without creating new cfwd-css for the phones, which would imo nullify any advantage of lrg.

Thanks, 

-- 
Nick Marus
nmarus at gmail.com
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091118/ecb4eba0/attachment.html>