[cisco-voip] IPIPGW

[Nick Matthews]

More importantly - if you're not transcoding, you don't need the PVDM
at all for an IPIPGW.  Be sure that we're talking about a SIP-SIP,
SIP-H323, or H323-H323 connection when you say IPIPGW, which I'm
assuming is correct here.  No voice termination, transcoding, or
conferencing?  Don't need DSPs.

-nick

On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:37 PM, Mark Holloway <mh at markholloway.com> wrote:
> PVDM2-64 will handle 32 G729 medium complexity calls.  PVDM2-32 will handle 16.  PVDM2-16 will handle 8.  You get the idea.
>
>
> On Nov 22, 2009, at 12:25 PM, Ali El Moussaoui wrote:
>
>> Hello Group,
>>
>> I am a silent watcher and this is my first post. I am planning a setup for an IPIPGW. The requirements state that the gteway must handle a full E1. My question is: how many PVDM2-64 I need? 1 or 2? note that i will be using G729 (medium complexity).
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ali
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>