[cisco-voip] TEHO legals and CLID

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

Your best bet would be to contact the local LEC and tell them your intentions and if they object, to show you legislation that requires you to use the PSTN. I know after reading the SRND for CUCMv7, that India prohibits some types of VOIP traffic. 


--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tired Banchini" <tired.banchini at googlemail.com> 
To: "Voice Noob" <voicenoob at gmail.com> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Thursday, October 8, 2009 5:11:15 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] TEHO legals and CLID 


I am in UK, but reviewing global dial plan covering all major continents.... 

I had thought ASIA PAC may have some restrictions... 


On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:30 AM, Voice Noob < voicenoob at gmail.com > wrote: 






What country are you in? In the US you can do TEHO all day long. 






From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net ] On Behalf Of Tired Banchini 
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 4:39 PM 
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Subject: [cisco-voip] TEHO legals and CLID 






Hi everyone. 

I was wondering if anyone can advise or point me in the direction of some authoritative documentation on the legal implications of TEHO, if any... in global context, or at least with major continents? 

My loose understanding as this all on-net (intra-company) calls are legal; must admit I get conflicting opinions, although majority suggest this is OK. In terms of TEHO, i.e. break out, opinion seems a little more blurred... is there any authoritive references on this anyone can advise of? 

Also again my experience limited in this field, in the same context, TEHO and CLID. I would kind of anticipate th 

at large carriers would expect to see specific DDI ranges or routes as CLID on access truunks into there cloud and hence will block numbers that don't match the expected CLIDs, I have seen this with some SPs, again I am not sure if this is just a loose best practice or where it becomes mandatory.... can anyone offer any worldly advice please....? 

Thanks in advance 
TB 

_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091008/e52d5b5b/attachment.html>