[cisco-voip] QoS for Day to Day traffic
Lelio Fulgenzi
lelio at uoguelph.ca
Mon Oct 12 11:07:35 EDT 2009
Will there be regular data, like FTP, web, etc coming from PCs contending with that phone ip traffic though? I would put it all together in the voice class. Last thing you need is someone trying to FTP a DVD ISO and causing your phones to somehow loose connectivity. Likely won't happen, but just in case.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Dunn" <cheesevoice at gmail.com>
To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
Cc: "Cisco Voice" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 11:02:45 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] QoS for Day to Day traffic
The DHCP, RTCP, TFTP traffic can all be lumped into the Day2Day class, as that 8 Megs should be reserved.
That is traffic that is NOT part of the 10.31.0.0 subnet. The remaining 89 Megs will then carry DR traffic only.
Does that make sense?
Kevin
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi < lelio at uoguelph.ca > wrote:
I don't know your network, and my network hat has some dust on it, but according to your match statements, it looks like you're matching actual voice traffic only. Do the phones not also have traffic that is not marked as voice traffic such as DHCP, TFTP, signalling, etc? Isn't that reguarl IP traffic?
Also, how many phones at the remote site? We have a remote site with a hundred meg link as well, and we asked to get the maximum number of calls reserved. We're not even close to utilization, but I imagine, if we were, we would go with a mechanism like yours where it's reserved but shared.
Just some thoughts.
---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Dunn" < cheesevoice at gmail.com >
To: "Cisco Voice" < cisco-voip at puck.nether.net >
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2009 10:41:19 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: [cisco-voip] QoS for Day to Day traffic
Hello my Pundits
I have a 100Meg Ethernet WAN connection between two towns for DR purposes, and we are going to run "day to day" traffic (voice and data) over this circuit as well, now when replication and SAN to SAN traffic hits I don't want it to mess with the "day to day" traffic. The DR traffic will either source or destination to 10.31.0.0. So I made a couple of ACL's to match that IP to. The end result is I want to voice traffic to have priority and 3Megs of bandwidth, Day to Day traffic around 8 Megs of traffic and DR (San to San) the remaining 89%....
1. Do you think this will work?
2. Do you think it is set up right?
class-map match-any voice
match dscp ef
match protocol rtp audio
class-map match-any DR
match access-group 100
class-map match-any day2day
match access-group 101
policy-map DRandVoice
class voice
priority percent 3
class DR
bandwidth remaining percent 89
class day2day
bandwidth remaining percent 8
access-list 100 permit ip 10.31.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 deny ip 10.31.0.0 0.0.255.255
access-list 101 permit ip any any
Kevin Dunn
Marathon Cheese Corporation
_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091012/72c17c42/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list