[cisco-voip] anyone upgraded to Cm 6.1.4a?

[Wes Sisk]

***NOTE-1: This is the first ES version with the fix, all subsequent ESs 
for that version will also contain the fix.

***NOTE-2: For 6.1.4 and higher versions (in 6.x only), CSCsy33379 was 
used to checkin all DST fixes.


Yes, 6.1(4).

/wes

On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 4:25:03 PM, Jeff Garvas <jeff at cia.net> wrote:
> Wes,
>
> I stumbled upon this doing a search for something else.  Is the 
> consensus at this point for a 6.1.2 cluster to skip 6.1.3 and go 
> directly to 6.1.4 to resolve this ?
>
> I'm not sure where the table below came from so I'm wondering what the 
> "NOTE-2" was ?
>
> -Jeff
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com 
> <mailto:wsisk at cisco.com>> wrote:
>
>     Last I knew:
>
>     Please be aware customers need to deploy a UCM version containing
>     a fix for *CSCsy25150
>     <http://tools.cisco.com/Support/BugToolKit/search/getBugDetails.do?method=fetchBugDetails&bugId=CSCsy25150>*
>     prior to November 1, 2009 if they reside in an affected time zone. 
>
>     The fix is available in the following (*and any higher*) versions:
>
>     *Version * 	*CCO Released Version
>     (with the fix)* 	*Engineering Special***NOTE-1
>     (with the fix)*
>     7.1(2) 	All 	All
>     7.0(2) 	7.0(2a) - 007.000(002.20000.005) 	007.000(002.11004.002)
>     7.0(1) 	7.0(1)SU1a - 007.000(001.11002.004) 	007.000(001.21022.002)
>     6.1(4)
>     (***See *NOTE-2* below***) 	All 	All
>     6.1(3) 	6.1(3b)SU1 - 006.001(003.3190.001)
>     6.1(3b) - 006.001(003.3000.001) 	006.001(003.2104.001)
>     6.1(2) 	None 	006.001(002.1139.001)
>     6.0(1) 	None 	006.000(001.3119.001)
>     5.1(3) 	5.1(3f) - 005.001(003.7000.005) 	005.001(003.6104.001)
>
>
>
>     What gives the impression that 7.1.3 is affected by DST?
>
>     /Wes
>
>
>     On Friday, September 25, 2009 9:57:45 PM, Stu Packett
>     <spackett at gmail.com> <mailto:spackett at gmail.com> wrote:
>>     I upgraded from 6.1.2 to 6.1.4 SU1 last weekend and have not had
>>     any technical problems with it.  I too upgraded to avoid DST
>>     issues.  The only calls we got were from color phone users
>>     noticing that the gray bar on their name was gone and some that
>>     felt the phone display looked "funny" during a call.  It's all a
>>     cosmetic adjustment for your color phone users.
>>
>>     On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com
>>     <mailto:svoll.voip at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         I'm still on 6.1.2.1106 and don't want to deal with DST issues.
>>
>>         So I'm looking at 6.1.4a.  any comments?
>>
>>         Scott
>>
>>         _______________________________________________
>>         cisco-voip mailing list
>>         cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>>         https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>     ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     _______________________________________________ cisco-voip
>>     mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>     <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     cisco-voip mailing list
>     cisco-voip at puck.nether.net <mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
>     https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091021/91b83759/attachment.html>