[cisco-voip] anyone upgraded to Cm 6.1.4a?

Ryan Ratliff rratliff at cisco.com
Thu Oct 22 11:35:59 EDT 2009


Reboot, go into bios and set the date ahead.  The difference from the  
NTP server should be too big to allow it to sync.

-Ryan

On Oct 22, 2009, at 11:22 AM, Scott Voll wrote:

OK.  I'm on CCM 6.1.4a.  bounced all the phones.  Looks like all the  
phones have the correct firmware based on the CM 6.1.4a.

so, on monday when I come in all should be correct.  then in Two weeks  
when I come in, they should have changed back to PST right?

If I want to test, how do I test?  everything is running NTP

thanks

Scott



On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
***NOTE-1: This is the first ES version with the fix, all subsequent  
ESs for that version will also contain the fix.

***NOTE-2: For 6.1.4 and higher versions (in 6.x only), CSCsy33379 was  
used to checkin all DST fixes.


Yes, 6.1(4).

/wes


On Wednesday, October 21, 2009 4:25:03 PM, Jeff Garvas <jeff at cia.net>  
wrote:
> Wes,
>
> I stumbled upon this doing a search for something else.  Is the  
> consensus at this point for a 6.1.2 cluster to skip 6.1.3 and go  
> directly to 6.1.4 to resolve this ?
>
> I'm not sure where the table below came from so I'm wondering what  
> the "NOTE-2" was ?
>
> -Jeff
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com> wrote:
> Last I knew:
>
> Please be aware customers need to deploy a UCM version containing a  
> fix for CSCsy25150 prior to November 1, 2009 if they reside in an  
> affected time zone.
> The fix is available in the following (and any higher) versions:
>
> Version	CCO Released Version
> (with the fix)	Engineering Special***NOTE-1
> (with the fix)
> 7.1(2)	All	All
> 7.0(2)	7.0(2a) - 007.000(002.20000.005)	007.000(002.11004.002)
> 7.0(1)	7.0(1)SU1a - 007.000(001.11002.004)	007.000(001.21022.002)
> 6.1(4)
> (***See NOTE-2 below***)	All	All
> 6.1(3)	6.1(3b)SU1 - 006.001(003.3190.001)
> 6.1(3b) - 006.001(003.3000.001)	006.001(003.2104.001)
> 6.1(2)	None	006.001(002.1139.001)
> 6.0(1)	None	006.000(001.3119.001)
> 5.1(3)	5.1(3f) - 005.001(003.7000.005)	005.001(003.6104.001)
>
> What gives the impression that 7.1.3 is affected by DST?
>
> /Wes
>
>
> On Friday, September 25, 2009 9:57:45 PM, Stu Packett <spackett at gmail.com 
> > wrote:
>> I upgraded from 6.1.2 to 6.1.4 SU1 last weekend and have not had  
>> any technical problems with it.  I too upgraded to avoid DST  
>> issues.  The only calls we got were from color phone users noticing  
>> that the gray bar on their name was gone and some that felt the  
>> phone display looked "funny" during a call.  It's all a cosmetic  
>> adjustment for your color phone users.
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 3:03 PM, Scott Voll <svoll.voip at gmail.com>  
>> wrote:
>> I'm still on 6.1.2.1106 and don't want to deal with DST issues.
>>
>> So I'm looking at 6.1.4a.  any comments?
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091022/e1ee607c/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list