[cisco-voip] Route pattern Issue on Closest Match

[Fuermann, Jason]

I think 9.01X! is catching because you are matching 3 digits and [689] isn't because you are only matching 1. Are you using enbloc dialing, or dialing from tone?

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Kin Wai
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:39 AM
To: 'Ryan Ratliff'
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Route pattern Issue on Closest Match

Hi Ryan,
Thanks for the explanation.

Originally, 9.010! is actually in a partition known as P_International while  [689]XXXXXXX is in a partition call P_local

The CSS I'm using is as follows

1)      P_Internal

2)      P_Local

3)      P_International

However, it seems like 9.010! route pattern always takes the priority.
I always think that it will search partition by partition too, now It's bothering me.


(I have attached a screenshot together, not sure whether it's permitted or not in the newsgroup.)

Regards,
Kin Wai


From: Ryan Ratliff [mailto:rratliff at cisco.com]
Sent: Friday, October 30, 2009 10:54 PM
To: Kin Wai
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Route pattern Issue on Closest Match

It should be the most specific match only if the two patterns are in the same partition.  If they are in different partitions I believe it takes the higher partition in the CSS even if it is less specific.

In your case however the 9.010! is more specific because it has fewer wildcards, ie it is matching 4 specific digits vs only 1 in [3689]XXXXXXX.

-Ryan

On Oct 30, 2009, at 10:43 AM, Kin Wai wrote:

I have 2 route patterns in the same partition,
9.010!
or
[3689]XXXXXXX


Which one is closest match above?
If I key in 90101314

I keep getting the result of 9.010! , just wondering do I hit into some bug or I had the wrong concept.

Cheers,
Kin Wai


_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20091030/85edac3a/attachment.html>