[cisco-voip] "Tinny" sound quality with 8.4.3 on 7970?

[Dana Tong (AU)]

I agree. I try to standardise on G711 (and G729 over the WAN). I thought G722 sounded tinny also.

Cheers


-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Zapp, Brandon D
Sent: Tuesday, 1 September 2009 10:36 AM
To: Robert Kulagowski
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] "Tinny" sound quality with 8.4.3 on 7970?

We have had tinny issues when going to other codecs like g729 and
g722. So  we pretty much use g711. Plus it plays better with ipccx.

Brandon

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 31, 2009, at 6:30 PM, "Robert Kulagowski" <rkulagow at gmail.com>
wrote:

> We've done a partial cut to CM 7.0, and G.722 is now available to
> our users.  We've received some reports that when one or both
> parties at a site are using their speakerphone on the 7970, it
> sounds "tinny" or static-y.
>
> Is this a case of higher-audio-fidelity == "worse" sound quality?
> (In that users are used to G.711)?
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

******************************************************************************
 - NOTICE FROM DIMENSION DATA AUSTRALIA
This message is confidential, and may contain proprietary or legally privileged information.  If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete it immediately.

Internet communications are not secure. You should scan this message and any attachments for viruses.  Under no circumstances do we accept liability for any loss or damage which may result from your receipt of this message or any attachments.
******************************************************************************