[cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4?

[Lelio Fulgenzi]

it was more word of mouth and a few presentations i saw. but apparently things are changing. go figure. 

--- 
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
"Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Brandon Phelps" <btphelps at atomicnets.com> 
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:47:28 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4? 

Is there a document stating this or is your experience.. or some memo I 
missed? 

Does anyone know what Cisco does in secondary subversions with 
Callmanager? I assume just bug fixes? Are features ever added to a 
secondary subversion or even a primary subversion? 

And finally, for something completely different, and something I've 
carried for the few years since 5 came out: does the name 
"Communications Manager" bother you technically? I understand why Cisco 
might rename the product for a marketing reason. The rub that always 
gets me is that I'm never very sure how to search for things on the 
Internet that are related. "Communications Manager"? Callmanager? CUCM? 
"Cisco CM"? How do others search for CM related things on the Internet 
(and Cisco's site for that matter...)? 

Thanks for all the talk it's been interesting. 

B 

Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: 
> Not easy, but necessary. Even taking a look at SEV 1/2 bugs should be 
> enough. Also, my understanding is that ES's are no longer what ES's were 
> in the days of 3.x and 4.x (possibly 5.x). They're not built for 
> individual customers like they used to be, but essentially, they are 
> what service packs used to be. Granted they're not published for some 
> reason. 
> 
> 
> 
> --- 
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Brandon Phelps" <btphelps at atomicnets.com> 
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> Sent: Monday, August 31, 2009 10:00:28 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4? 
> 
> meh, thats easy to do. Looking more for opinions and anecdotes. 
> 
> Would most people install an ES without having a specific reason for 
> doing so? 
> 
> B 
> 
> 
> Lelio Fulgenzi wrote: 
> > I think you'll hear from Cisco TAC over and over, always use the latest 
> > version and the latest ES. Nowadays, especially from x.x.3 to x.x.4 it's 
> > not feature enhancements but bug fixes mostly. Or so we're told. Take a 
> > look at the bug list, see if there are any that stand out and not work 
> > for you. 
> > 
> > --- 
> > Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A. 
> > Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1 
> > (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN) 
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ 
> > "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt 
> > 
> > 
> > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > From: "Brandon Phelps" <btphelps at atomicnets.com> 
> > To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> > Sent: Sunday, August 30, 2009 8:35:38 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern 
> > Subject: [cisco-voip] Call for opinions; 6.1.3 or 6.1.4? 
> > 
> > Which one is more stable? 
> > 
> > CUCM 6.1.3 or 6.1.4? 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > cisco-voip mailing list 
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > cisco-voip mailing list 
> > cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> cisco-voip mailing list 
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 

_______________________________________________ 
cisco-voip mailing list 
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net 
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090910/eb133df3/attachment.html>