[cisco-voip] CM 8.0

Scott Voll svoll.voip at gmail.com
Mon Sep 28 16:04:06 EDT 2009


interesting you said that.
at our meeting we have some K12 orgs that are redundant using mySQL.  As for
the support there are firms in our area that do provide support.

But it is something else to weigh-in as it is a cost.

Scott

On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:01 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> I think there are others who will look at asterisk as well once it fixes up
> a few things:
>
>    - scalability
>    - redundancy/reliability
>    - user interface
>    - forwarding from secondary lines. no, wait, that works. nevermind.
>
>
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> Cc: "Voice Noob" <voicenoob at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 3:56:05 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM 8.0
>
> It will be interesting to see how VoIP continues to evolve in Oregon.  K12
> got together about a month ago to talk about how we could all move to
> Asterisk.  I wasn't very interested at the time, but if Cisco continues to
> out price there stuff, it will force the issue.  Just like moving from Unity
> to exchange.
> Cisco can either look at pricing....... or look at customers leaving.
>
> Scott
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>wrote:
>
>> There was an FAQ out there that I either read from this list and/or posted
>> to the list. Basically, it says that future upgrades will cost the same as
>> purchasing new. I think Cisco is trying to make it hard for you to say no to
>> UCSS.
>>
>> Basically, the cost of an upgrade will be the same as two years of UCSS or
>> something like that.
>>
>> I think they're also trying to make CUWL very attractive as well. Soon, I
>> don't think we'll have any option. First they'll make it ridiculously
>> expensive then they'll retire the option since no one is getting it. It will
>> either be CUWL w/ UCSS or buy new each time.
>>
>> Back to PBX days. ;)
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Voice Noob" <voicenoob at gmail.com>
>> To: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 3:46:52 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] CM 8.0
>>
>>  Would you drop just UCCS or ESW as well?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Voll
>> *Sent:* Monday, September 28, 2009 2:17 PM
>> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] CM 8.0
>>
>>
>>
>> Historically I've been a X.1 release kind of guy as I have been nailed on
>> some X.0 releases (UCCx 4.0 -- 23hr upgrade).
>>
>>
>>
>> But since Cm went to the appliance model, are there the same fears of
>> moving to a 8.0 release so long as it's a 8.0.3 type release?
>>
>>
>>
>> <Cisco guys plug your ears>
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm thinking since I have subscription and smartnet getting onto the 8.x
>> train and then not subscribing next year.
>>
>>
>>
>> what are others thoughts?
>>
>>
>>
>> <OK you can unplug your ears>
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Last I heard was they were looking at 18 months between major versions.
>> So, if v7.0 was out last summer, then you're looking at sometime in Jan 2010
>> for v8 (of CUCM anyways). I don't thing the .1 releases are as tightly
>> controlled.
>>
>> There was an EFT for Connection 8.0 not to long ago, and it's typically 6
>> to 8 months between EFT and release. So that would coincide with a Jan-Apr
>> release of v8.
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Scott Voll" <svoll.voip at gmail.com>
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>
>> Sent: Monday, September 28, 2009 2:59:22 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] CM 8.0
>>
>> Any idea when CM 8.0 is supposed to be out?  what about 8.1?
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm just planning my next upgrade?
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone heard about when UCCx 8.0 is supposed to be out?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090928/ce8b3a67/attachment.html>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list