[cisco-voip] Restoring 4.1(3)sr5d Publisher?
Wes Sisk
wsisk at cisco.com
Wed Sep 30 14:14:14 EDT 2009
Oh, and this only applies to CM 4.x. CM5.x and later changes all the rules.
/Wes
On Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:13:41 PM, Wes Sisk <wsisk at cisco.com>
wrote:
> yep. something that keeps L1/L2/L3 up and lets the server use the IP
> bound to the ethernet interface. If you use DHCP that clearly
> introduces other limitations.
>
> /wes
>
> On Wednesday, September 30, 2009 2:08:05 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi
> <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>> so, changing the VLAN on the switch is good enough?
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
>> To: "Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
>> Cc: "Dane" <dane at pktloss.net>, cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 1:35:00 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
>> Eastern
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Restoring 4.1(3)sr5d Publisher?
>>
>> If TAC engineer is not familiar then yes, please do escalate. It is
>> still supported and this knowledge is still available to help you.
>>
>> Otherwise -
>> it is good to install and upgrade the publisher offline. It is not
>> good to take the publisher offline by simply unplugging the network
>> cable. That takes down the IP interface and causes numerous problems
>> with installs and upgrades.
>>
>> /Wes
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:40:55 AM, Lelio Fulgenzi
>> <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>>
>> Your process is what I would do. Get it running to the version
>> you have now offline and then once you have restored everything
>> from backup shut down the publisher, plug it in and then restart
>> it. once it is restarted, you will have to restart the TFTP
>> server and other subscribers.
>>
>> Hopefully you don't have to republish the databases. But if you
>> do, you can use the dbhelper tool to do that.
>>
>> Hopefully others will help.
>>
>> P.S. If your TAC engineer is not familiar with 4.1, then I would
>> ask to have the case escalated to someone who has 4.1 experience.
>>
>> ---
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
>> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
>> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
>> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> "Bad grammar makes me [sic]" - Tshirt
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Dane" <dane at pktloss.net>
>> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 11:21:46 AM GMT -05:00
>> US/Canada Eastern
>> Subject: [cisco-voip] Restoring 4.1(3)sr5d Publisher?
>>
>> We had a drive fail on our publisher and had someone swap it out last
>> night. Well it seems they made a couple of mistakes and left me no
>> option but having to rebuild and restore now.
>>
>> Were running 4.1(3)sr5d and have a current BARS backup.
>>
>> Problem is all the media we have is some what old so I am having to
>> install and upgrade and upgrade and upgrade to get back to where we
>> were.
>>
>> My concern centers around the fact that this is the publisher that is
>> down and having to be rebuilt using older media and then upgrading to
>> get back to the point we were. Is there a risk in corrupting or
>> interrupting the subscriber that is currently operational and running
>> everything? I am afraid of the publisher coming back online too
>> early
>> during the process and somehow overwriting information on the
>> subscriber before the publisher is fully built.
>>
>> My TAC engineer isn't familiar with the 4.1 release and windows side
>> of things. Currently the plan he suggests based on the media we have
>> available is to install 4.0.2 (from media) offline (unplug cable),
>> then upgrade it to 4.1(3), then upgrade to 4.1(3)sr5d, then install
>> BARS from that version of CM and do the restore of the BARS backup
>> data.
>>
>> Does this sound right to others?
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20090930/8da33491/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list