[cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?

[jeremy co]

well, I know this order but CngPTP break these rules.

Check out this scenario:   call---->TP---->RP-----------> SLRG----->GW

,check EPNM on TP and RP ,put CngPTP on GW.    it overrides.
,check EPNM  only on RP ,put CngPTP on GW.    it does not override.
,check EPNM  only on TP  ,put CngPTP on GW.    it  overrides.



How these mess works with CngPTP?


Jeremy




On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:

> The farther down the chain you go the override happens. So:
>
> gateway overrides RL
> RL overrides RG
> RG overrides RP
> RP overrides phone
>
> Pretty sure about this, but I'm sure someone will chime in.
>
> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
> Computing & Communications
> University of Guelph
> 519-824-4120 x56354
>
> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>
> [XKJ2000]
>
>
> On 2010-04-14, at 10:09 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Hi,
>>
>> Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of operation
>> in CUCM 7.0.1?
>>
>>
>> I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area.   It should
>> override RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!
>>
>> What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?
>>
>>
>>
>> I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this
>> relationship?
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Jeremy
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/6551281d/attachment.html>