[cisco-voip] Plz help, anyone knows the order of operation of Calling party transformation patterns in CUCM 7.0.1?

[Ted Nugent]

1. External Phone Number Mask on calling device.

2. Translation Pattern.

3. Route Pattern.

4. Route List using Route Group details.

5. Transformation on the terminating device.


AFAIK that is officially how its "SUPPOSED" to work... As with most things
with in CUCM YMMV...


 Also keep in mind that "Use Calling Party\'s External Phone Number Mask"
flagged to Yes should override anything set on the RP and TP and reset CPN
to EPNM but should still be overwritten by the GW


DNA might be an quick way to test as opposed to using q931 debugs on the GW.




On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 10:22 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:

> well, I know this order but CngPTP break these rules.
>
> Check out this scenario:   call---->TP---->RP-----------> SLRG----->GW
>
> ,check EPNM on TP and RP ,put CngPTP on GW.    it overrides.
> ,check EPNM  only on RP ,put CngPTP on GW.    it does not override.
> ,check EPNM  only on TP  ,put CngPTP on GW.    it  overrides.
>
>
>
> How these mess works with CngPTP?
>
>
> Jeremy
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 12:13 PM, <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
>> The farther down the chain you go the override happens. So:
>>
>> gateway overrides RL
>> RL overrides RG
>> RG overrides RP
>> RP overrides phone
>>
>> Pretty sure about this, but I'm sure someone will chime in.
>>
>> Lelio Fulgenzi, Senior Analyst
>> Computing & Communications
>> University of Guelph
>> 519-824-4120 x56354
>>
>> ...sent from my iPod - please pardon my fat fingers ;)
>>
>> [XKJ2000]
>>
>>
>> On 2010-04-14, at 10:09 PM, jeremy co <jeremy.cool14 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Hi,
>>>
>>> Anyone knows how calling party transformation pattern order of operation
>>> in CUCM 7.0.1?
>>>
>>>
>>> I just got confused and docs are pretty weak in this area.   It should
>>> override RP,RG,RL configuration. But apparently it would not!
>>>
>>> What is the relationship of checking EPNM on TPRP,GW and CngPTP ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I really appreciate any comment on this. Any doc that explain this
>>> relationship?
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Jeremy
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cisco-voip mailing list
>>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100415/3023f350/attachment.html>