[cisco-voip] Phone tftp client vs ftp client

[Norton, Mike]

BitTorrent would be an awesome choice of protocol, methinks. The more phones you have, the faster they’d load.

--
Mike Norton
I.T. Support
Peace Wapiti School Division No. 76
Helpdesk: 780-831-3080
Direct: 780-831-3076


From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Lelio Fulgenzi
Sent: April-22-10 12:05 PM
To: Wes Sisk
Cc: cisco-voip voyp list
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phone tftp client vs ftp client

well, considering Connection does directory updates via SMTP, you never know what might happen.



---
Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
(519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
                              - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)


----- Original Message -----
From: "Wes Sisk" <wsisk at cisco.com>
To: "Jason Aarons (US)" <jason.aarons at us.didata.com>
Cc: "cisco-voip voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 2:01:00 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Phone tftp client vs ftp client

Anything not released is roadmap and under NDA.  I've not heard any ftp discussions but I have heard other transfer protocols discussed.

/Wes

On Thursday, April 22, 2010 1:47:38 PM, Jason Aarons (US) <jason.aarons at us.didata.com><mailto:jason.aarons at us.didata.com> wrote:

I wonder if there are any long term plans to switch from tftp to ftp as phone image files keep growing  larger…..seems a phone across a slow wan shouldn’t take 15-20 minutes to upgrade a 9MB image.  I switched to ftp/http for router upgrades years ago as it was almost twice as fast. Wish the phones would change from tftp to ftp or http, etc.

TFTP benefits
  Small footprint client

TFTP limitations
  ACK every packet
  512 byte packet size maximum

FTP benefits
   1500 byte packets
   Scaling windows TCP, etc
   No real drawbacks except client footprint is larger
________________________________

Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer. Thank you.




________________________________






_______________________________________________

cisco-voip mailing list

cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>

https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




_______________________________________________ cisco-voip mailing list cisco-voip at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100422/3768d2f8/attachment.html>