[cisco-voip] IOS Upgrade - Voice Gateway 1760
Jamie Weatherhead
Jamie.Weatherhead at Charles-Stanley.co.uk
Thu Aug 12 11:30:22 EDT 2010
Hi Nick,
Most people seem to agree that the code should be fine.
Thank you all for your assistance.
Regards,
Jamie
From: matthn at gmail.com [mailto:matthn at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Nick
Matthews
Sent: 12 August 2010 16:27
To: James Buchanan
Cc: Jamie Weatherhead; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] IOS Upgrade - Voice Gateway 1760
This isn't an upgrade worth doing. You're moving a few code revisions
up in the same code train. If you're not having problems I wouldn't
upgrade as you gain no new features or compatibility.
-nick
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM, James Buchanan <jbuchanan at ctiusa.com>
wrote:
Hello,
The biggest dependencies come around SRST and MGCP. Are you using this
gateway for either one of those?
Even in that case, I've run MGCP with UCM 7.1 and 12.4(15)T9 with no
issues on a 2691 gateway. Also, I've run SRST with code in that train.
The issue you'll hit is that if you ever run the newer phones at that
site and need to do SRST, they may not be able to register.
Thanks,
James Buchanan | Senior Network Engineer | South Region | Presidio
Networked Solutions
12 Cadillac Dr, Suite 130, Brentwood, TN 37027 | jbuchanan at presidio.com
<mailto:jbuchanan at ctiusa.com>
D: 615-866-5729 | F: 615-866-5781 | www.presidio.com
<http://www.presidio.com>
CCIE #25863, Voice
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Jamie
Weatherhead
Sent: Thursday, August 12, 2010 4:54 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] IOS Upgrade - Voice Gateway 1760
Hello all,
We plan on upgrading our CUCM cluster to version 7.1(3b)SU2 from version
6.1(4).
We currently run 1760 voice gateways with the IOS:
'c1700-ipvoicek9-mz.124-15.T9.bin' (12.4T range).
I wanted to establish if the latest version of this IOS would be good
enough for CUCM7.1(3b)SU2:
Latest 124.T IOS: c1700-ipvoicek9-mz.124-15.T13.bin Release: April 2010.
Any advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
Jamie
Consider the environment - Think before you print
The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient
and may not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and
any attachments are virus free, it is the responsibility of the
recipient to confirm this.
You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be
sent by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does
not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where
applicable), can be found at this URL
http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/
<http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/>
Consider the environment - Think before you print
The contents of this email are confidential to the intended recipient and may not be disclosed. Although it is believed that this email and any attachments are virus free, it is the responsibility of the recipient to confirm this.
You are advised that urgent, time-sensitive communications should not be sent by email. We hereby give you notice that a delivery receipt does not constitute acknowledgement or receipt by the intended recipient(s).
Details of Charles Stanley group companies and their regulators (where applicable), can be found at this URL http://www.charles-stanley.co.uk/contact-us/disclosure/
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100812/7314dc83/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list