[cisco-voip] what is: "cablelength long 0db"

[Nick Matthews]

I'm sure there are a few cases out there.  I just haven't seen it in over a
100+ cases I've been involved with.  It receives a lot of unjust attention.

-nick

On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 6:23 PM, Fuermann, Jason <JBF005 at shsu.edu> wrote:

>  I’m going with Go0se on this one. We use to have a circuit that wouldn’t
> work without the cablelength long command. Conversely, I seem to remember
> the opposite problem with having the command on a short cable causing a
> circuit not to work.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Lelio Fulgenzi
> *Sent:* Monday, August 23, 2010 4:54 PM
> *To:* Nick Matthews
> *Cc:* voyp list
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] what is: "cablelength long 0db"
>
>
>
> and today's SAT prep question:
>
> (1) How Lelio feels about not being to forward secondary lines is like Nick
> feels about:
>
> (a) cablelength long 0db
> (b) cablelength long 0db
> (c) cablelength long 0db
> (d) all of the above.
>
>
> but seriously, I can remove it then?
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> *From: *"Nick Matthews" <matthnick at gmail.com>
> *To: *"Lelio Fulgenzi" <lelio at uoguelph.ca>
> *Cc: *"voyp list" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> *Sent: *Monday, August 23, 2010 5:49:18 PM
> *Subject: *Re: [cisco-voip] what is: "cablelength long 0db"
>
> I would personally be happy if this command was removed from IOS
> completely.  Myself and a large number of other people who work with these
> types of things many times daily have never seen this command do anything.
> Except waste troubleshooting time, and have people who would like to have a
> technical opinion on something they don't know anything about bring it up.
> It does that quite well.  There, I said it.
>
> And if you see 'unknown protocol drops' on your interface counters you can
> ignore that too.
>
> -nick
>
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Lelio Fulgenzi <lelio at uoguelph.ca> wrote:
>
> I've got this on my new 3845, but it's not on my other one.
>  ------------------------------
>
> controller T1 0/0/0
>  cablelength long 0db
> !
> controller T1 0/1/0
>  cablelength long 0db
>  ------------------------------
>
>
>
> And another thing, why am I running "(C3845-SPSERVICESK9-M), Version
> 15.0(1)M2"
>
> isn't SP mean ServiceProvider? I'm sure I didn't ask for this.
>
> What are people normally running on their branch voice routers ???
>
> ---
> Lelio Fulgenzi, B.A.
> Senior Analyst (CCS) * University of Guelph * Guelph, Ontario N1G 2W1
> (519) 824-4120 x56354 (519) 767-1060 FAX (JNHN)
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Cooking with unix is easy. You just sed it and forget it.
>                               - LFJ (with apologies to Mr. Popeil)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100823/fa5e4956/attachment.html>