[cisco-voip] UCC Express Virtual server install
Matthew Saskin
msaskin at gmail.com
Wed Dec 8 13:45:31 EST 2010
I wouldn't call that expensive at all, especially for a large deployment.
Think about the labor spent cataloging phone MAC addresses, putting phones
in CUCM (even via BAT), and more importantly, ensuring that pre-configured
phones actually get placed in the appropriate location. I know I've seen
situations where a significant percentage of phones (5% or more) that are
preconfigured end up the wrong location. On a large (1000+ phone)
deployment, tracking down the phones and moving them, or reconfiguring them,
takes a lot of time.
$1/phone for a TAPS equivalent that's easier to use than TAPS and has more
features is *well* worth it.
-matthew
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Haas, Neal <nhaas at co.fresno.ca.us> wrote:
> This taps software is kind of expensive, $1 per phone to use……..wow.
>
>
>
> Neal
>
>
>
> *From:* Jason Aarons (US) [mailto:jason.aarons at us.didata.com]
> *Sent:* Friday, December 03, 2010 6:31 PM
> *To:* Haas, Neal; 'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'
> *Subject:* RE: UCC Express Virtual server install
>
>
>
> While it was unsupported you could make it work back in the CRS 4x-7x days.
> Haven’t looked at 8x.
>
>
>
> I would check out Voip Integrations product
> http://www.voipintegration.com/Software-Tool-For-Automated-Provisioning-System.aspxwhich they said even runs on Windows for Workgroups 3.11 and takes 5 minutes
> to setup.
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Haas, Neal
> *Sent:* Friday, December 03, 2010 2:27 PM
> *To:* 'cisco-voip at puck.nether.net'
> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] UCC Express Virtual server install
>
>
>
> I have the Cisco Unified Contact center Express / IP IVR, does anyone know
> if I can install this on a Virtual server. I just want to install it to do
> the TAPS server. This would be for a short period of time when we install a
> bunch of phones.
>
>
>
> Also this is a 5 seat license, is that good enough for the TAPS?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> Neal
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> *Disclaimer: This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
> confidential and privileged information and is for use by the designated
> addressee(s) named above only. If you are not the intended addressee, you
> are hereby notified that you have received this communication in error and
> that any use or reproduction of this email or its contents is strictly
> prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in
> error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting
> it from your computer. Thank you. *
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20101208/10bbca4d/attachment.html>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list