[cisco-voip] Mobile Connect (Single Number Reach)
Mike King
me at mpking.com
Thu Dec 9 16:09:19 EST 2010
That should be
9+1XXXXXXXXXX
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Mike King <me at mpking.com> wrote:
> How do you put that in?
>
> 0+1XXXXXXXXXX
>
> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Nate VanMaren <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org> wrote:
>> If it's LD we have a +1 pattern too. :)
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: michael.p.king at gmail.com [mailto:michael.p.king at gmail.com] On Behalf Of Mike King
>> Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 2:02 PM
>> To: Nate VanMaren
>> Cc: Cisco VoIPoE List
>> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Mobile Connect (Single Number Reach)
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Nate VanMaren <VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org> wrote:
>>> Mike,
>>>
>>> The rule is exact match causes the problem. So we have our system setup to route the call properly regardless of the way the user dials it, so 918015551212 and 98015551212 call the same way.
>>>
>>> Also to match inbound anchoring you do it like 8015551212 if that is the caller id you get from the carrier. It seems to use application dial rules to route the call.
>>>
>>> That is a few options.
>>>
>>> -Nate
>>>
>>
>> That is so cool. Unfortunately, "De De DA To complete calls beyond
>> your calling area, you must dial a 1......."
>>
>>
>> NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.
>>
>>
>>
>
More information about the cisco-voip
mailing list