[cisco-voip] ATA 186 vs. ATA 188 for fax machine use

[Matthew Loraditch]

188s featured an additional 10/100 port for a PC and are EOL/EOS, 186s are the only available option if you are getting new equipment.
Besides the PC port they are functionally the same AFAIK


Matthew Loraditch, CCNA
1965 Greenspring Drive
Timonium, MD 21093
support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com>
(p) (410) 252-8830
(F) (443) 541-1593

Visit us at www.heliontechnologies.com<http://www.heliontechnologies.com/>
Support Issue? Email support at heliontechnologies.com<mailto:support at heliontechnologies.com> for fast assistance!

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Leetun, Rob
Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:38 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA 186 vs. ATA 188 for fax machine use

Hi,

Which ATA is better for fax machine use, an ATA 188 or an ATA 186?  We are currently using ATA 188s.

Thanks!


Rob

Robert Leetun
Network Engineer
Boulder County Information Technology
2025 14th Street
Boulder, CO 80302
303 441-3866 (W)
303 441-3983 (F)
rleetun at bouldercounty.org<mailto:arees at bouldercounty.org>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100217/d60005f2/attachment.html>