[cisco-voip] Active Directory Integration using E.164

[Scott Voll]

other option is to use the ip phone number and map to your extensions and
leave telephone number the full format.

Scott

On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Mark Marquez <MMarquez at goldsys.com> wrote:

>  I’d like to hear from the list regarding the possible implications of
> using E.164 formatted numbers (i.e. +1333445555) in Active Directory and
> performing CUCM LDAP integration using CUCM7.  The internal extension ranges
> vary depending on location and can be either 4 or 5 digits extensions.  I
> realize that by populating Active Directory with E.164 numbers that the CUCM
> Directory would probably not have numbers in a “dialable” format.  In other
> words, I wouldn’t be able to select a telephone number via the Corporate
> Directory and dial it unless some kind of Translation pattern were applied
> behind the scenes. Again, I’m assuming I could use a Translation pattern to
> modify the E.164 number displayed in the Directory to either a 4 or 5 digits
> number.  If this is possible, and what other things should I take into
> consideration.
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100218/7cafc76c/attachment.html>