[cisco-voip] ATA 186 vs. ATA 188 for fax machine use

[Nick Matthews]

186v188 - no difference.

I agree with the VG202 sentiment, although there is a considerable
price difference.

-nick

On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Brantley Richbourg
<Brantley.Richbourg at mmicnc.com> wrote:
> I use 186's attached to older analog fax machines with no problems.  Since I
> did not need PC ports, I did not get the 188.
> ________________________________
> From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
> [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Leetun, Rob
> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2010 3:38 PM
> To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [cisco-voip] ATA 186 vs. ATA 188 for fax machine use
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Which ATA is better for fax machine use, an ATA 188 or an ATA 186?  We are
> currently using ATA 188s.
>
>
>
> Thanks!
>
>
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>
>
> Robert Leetun
>
> Network Engineer
>
> Boulder County Information Technology
>
> 2025 14th Street
>
> Boulder, CO 80302
>
> 303 441-3866 (W)
>
> 303 441-3983 (F)
>
> rleetun at bouldercounty.org
>
>
>
> Confidentiality: The information in this electronic mail may contain
> confidential, sensitive and/or protected health information intended only
> for the addressee(s). Any other person, including anyone who believes he/she
> might have received it due to an addressing error, is requested to notify
> this sender immediately by return e-mail, and shall delete it without
> further reading and retention. The information shall not be forwarded or
> shared unless in compliance with MMIC policies on confidentiality, and/or
> the written permission of this sender.
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>