[cisco-voip] Active Directory Integration using E.164

Mark Marquez MMarquez at goldsys.com
Thu Feb 18 22:24:18 EST 2010


Thanks goose.  Your screenshot verifies what I was thinking.  I also really like the IP phone option that Scott Voll suggested. I hadn't noticed that under the LDAP Directory configuration screen there are two options for Phone Number -telephoneNumber and ipPhone.  This is great.  I've got options. Thanks everyone.


Mark Marquez
Unified Communications Specialist
Gold Systems, Inc.
4840 Pearl East Circle, Suite #106
Boulder, Colorado 80301
303.447.2774 say "Mark Marquez"
mmarquez at goldsys.com<mailto:loui at goldsys.com>

From: Go0se [mailto:me at go0se.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:48 PM
To: Mark Marquez; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Active Directory Integration using E.164

I have done exactly what you describe for the same reason and  it works without any issues - at least none that I have seen. Added benefit: if you have users in remote offices that don't realize they can 4 digit dial it keeps them from ringing up toll charges or at worst if you have toll bypass configured it keeps them from tying up trunk lines.

[cid:image001.png at 01CAB0D8.38742240]

Thanks,

Go0se

My blog:
http://atc.go0se.com<http://atc.go0se.com/>

-------------------------------------
Help Hopegivers International
feed the orphans of India.
http://www.hopegivers.org<http://www.hopegivers.org/>
-------------------------------------

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Mark Marquez
Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 2:43 PM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: [cisco-voip] Active Directory Integration using E.164

I'd like to hear from the list regarding the possible implications of using E.164 formatted numbers (i.e. +1333445555) in Active Directory and performing CUCM LDAP integration using CUCM7.  The internal extension ranges vary depending on location and can be either 4 or 5 digits extensions.  I realize that by populating Active Directory with E.164 numbers that the CUCM Directory would probably not have numbers in a "dialable" format.  In other words, I wouldn't be able to select a telephone number via the Corporate Directory and dial it unless some kind of Translation pattern were applied behind the scenes. Again, I'm assuming I could use a Translation pattern to modify the E.164 number displayed in the Directory to either a 4 or 5 digits number.  If this is possible, and what other things should I take into consideration.


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100219/5d44e26d/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 42420 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100219/5d44e26d/attachment.png>


More information about the cisco-voip mailing list