[cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs. SCCPconfigurations

[Jason Aarons (US)]

I agree.

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net
[mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2010 7:46 PM
To: Leetun, Rob; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs.
SCCPconfigurations

SCCP is superior as a control protocol for VG224s as it not only makes
configuration of the ports extremely easy, it also enables a lot more
features that are otherwise unavailable if MGCP is used as a control
protocol.

SCCP essentially makes the 24 FXS ports into phones you can configure
just like any other IP phone within CCM.




________________________________
From: "Leetun, Rob" <rleetun at bouldercounty.org>
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Sent: Wed, January 6, 2010 3:42:45 PM
Subject: [cisco-voip] Configuring first VG224: MGCP vs. SCCP
configurations


Currently we have many old VG248 dinosaurs in our shop.  So
we started the configuration of our first VG224.  The question has been
raised
as to use either MGCP or SCCP.  Which one is the best and why?
 
Thanks.
 
Rob


      
_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

-----------------------------------------
Disclaimer:

This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain
confidential and privileged information and is for use by the
designated addressee(s) named above only.  If you are not the
intended addressee, you are hereby notified that you have received
this communication in error and that any use or reproduction of
this email or its contents is strictly prohibited and may be
unlawful.  If you have received this communication in error, please
notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it
from your computer. Thank you.