[cisco-voip] moving unified servers to DR site

[Bill Talley]

Manoj,

you kind find the relevant information in appropriate Cisco Unified
Communications design guides at http://www.cisco.com/go/srnd.


On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Manoj Kalpage <manoj.kalpage at gmail.com>wrote:

> We already have implemented DR and HA for CUCM 4.1 but not Unity 4.2. We
> are plan to upgrade CUCM to 7.x and Unity to Unity connection 7.x. I have
> suggested our consultant about DR and HA for Unity connection
> but they didn't recommend it saying that data replication between two unity
> connection servers may take more than 100mb.
> We have 100MB connection between two locations for data and voice.
> I would like to know more information about this like QoS and service
> policies. is there any link I can find information?
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 4:07 AM, Jason Shearer <jshearer at amedisys.com>wrote:
>
>>  Correct….I glossed over the IPCC requirement.  UCCX 8 will support
>> geodiverse HA.
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Bill Talley
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 12:12 PM
>> *To:* Matthew Saskin
>> *Cc:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] moving unified servers to DR site
>>
>>
>>
>> Cisco doesn't presently support CRS HA servers separated geographically.
>>
>>
>>
>> UCM and Unity are both supported in HA configurations,  depending on
>> minimum bandwidth guidelines and/or response times.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>>
>> On Jan 22, 2010, at 11:29 AM, Matthew Saskin <msaskin at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Regardless of what your consultants say, please bear in mind the Cisco
>> recommendations are also guidelines for them to support you.  If you run
>> into HA issues with unity or IPCC and you go to get TAC support, there's a
>> good chance you're not going to get full support out of Cisco if the overall
>> system design doesn't meet requirements.
>>
>>
>> Matthew Saskin
>> msaskin at gmail.com
>> 203-253-9571
>>
>> July 18, 2010 - 1500m swim (in the hudson), 40k bike, 10k run
>> Please support the Leukemia & Lyphoma Society
>> http://pages.teamintraining.org/nyc/nyctri10/msaskin
>>
>>  On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:30 AM, Scott Kee <SKee at cmsstl.com> wrote:
>>
>> Jason:  Got it..
>>
>> Thank you for the information.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Jason Shearer [mailto:jshearer at amedisys.com]
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 9:25 AM
>> *To:* Scott Kee; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* RE: moving unified servers to DR site
>>
>>
>>
>> We do it but have more than 10Mbs.  The most important thing here is
>> latency and QoS.  Monitor the bandwidth between the servers and adjust
>> service policies accordingly.
>>
>>
>>
>> Jason
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
>> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *Scott Kee
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 22, 2010 9:19 AM
>> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> *Subject:* [cisco-voip] moving unified servers to DR site
>>
>>
>>
>> We are trying to move our secondary HA Cisco unified servers to the Sun
>> Guard DR site.
>>
>>
>>
>> We are going to install 2nd CUCM subscriber server at the DR site and
>> move Secondary Unity and CRS server to the DR site.  Leave Primary Unity and
>> CRS server at the Corporate Data Center.
>>
>>
>>
>> Question is this: We are going to have ATT 10Mbps MPLS circuit to the Sun
>> Guard.  Per Cisco document you at least have to have 100Mbps connection to
>> the High Availability Servers but per our consultant people, 10Mbps is
>> sufficient.  I think this design will work fine but want to hear second
>> opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>> Has anyone done this before… Do you see any issue with this design?
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your help.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> *** NOTICE--The attached communication contains privileged and
>> confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, DO NOT
>> read, copy, or disseminate this communication. Non-intended recipients are
>> hereby placed on notice that any unauthorized disclosure, duplication,
>> distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of these
>> materials is expressly prohibited. If you have received this communication
>> in error, please delete this information in its entirety and contact the
>> Amedisys Privacy Hotline at 1-866-518-6684. Also, please immediately notify
>> the sender via e-mail that you have received this communication in error.
>> ***
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------
>> *** NOTICE--The attached communication contains privileged and
>> confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, DO NOT
>> read, copy, or disseminate this communication. Non-intended recipients are
>> hereby placed on notice that any unauthorized disclosure, duplication,
>> distribution, or taking of any action in reliance on the contents of these
>> materials is expressly prohibited. If you have received this communication
>> in error, please delete this information in its entirety and contact the
>> Amedisys Privacy Hotline at 1-866-518-6684. Also, please immediately notify
>> the sender via e-mail that you have received this communication in error.
>> ***
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-voip mailing list
>> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100123/8a248a7d/attachment.html>