[cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI

[Scott Voll]

if you are willing to move to a H323.  we use a TCL script for blocking
caller id (note it doesn't work well for blocked Caller ID).  ani_filter.tcl


Scott

On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:00 AM, Dennis Heim <Dennis.Heim at cdw.com> wrote:

> Translation pattern do not work as he needs them to.  Translation patterns
> work on called number, not calling. You could leave your MGCP gateway in
> place, and when the hit CUCM they get sent to a h.323 gateway that does the
> CLID blocking and otherwise sends them back to CCM for complete processing.
> This is not the cleanest because you are sending it to another  or the same
> gateway but as H.323. But it does avoid having to convert your gateway from
> MGCP to H.323.
>
>
>
> Dennis Heim
> Network Voice Engineer
> CDW  Advanced Technology Services
> 11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
> Carmel, IN  46032
>
> 317.569.4255 Office
> 317.569.4201 Fax
> 317.694.6070 Cell
>
> dennis.heim at cdw.com
> www.berbee.com
>
>
>
> *From:* cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] *On Behalf Of *John Huston
> *Sent:* Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:06 AM
> *To:* cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI
>
>
>
> All you need to is build a translation pattern and then route to a null
> partition.  You can practice with your cell phone and then put in the actual
> number.
>
>
>
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 1/28/10, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI
> To: "tmdvoip" <tmdvoip at gmail.com>
> Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> Date: Thursday, January 28, 2010, 8:46 AM
>
> If you are referring to blocking calls based on calling party number your
> provider can certainly assist with this.
> CUCM cannot natively do it but your router can (if using H.323 between the
> gateway and CUCM).
>
> Try searching google 'cucm block incoming call' and you will find many,
> many hits.
>
> -Ryan
>
> On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:40 AM, tmdvoip wrote:
>
> Guys:
>
> This is my configuration
> CUCM 6.1.4 (2 CM's in cluster)
> Cisco Unity 5.0.1 Exchange
> NON-SIP
> Cisco 2851 Routers
>
> My client complains of harassing phone calls at one of their locations.
> All the calls go to a single directory number; it would be nice if the
> recipient of there calls would simply let the calls go to Voice Mail;
> however this project has political ramifications. Also, the calls are
> sometimes transferred from other users.
>
> AT&T is the provider of the PRI's.
>
> This is the Questions;
>
> Does anyone know if AT&T can block at their end?
> Is this something I can do relatively easy with CM Translation Patterns?
> I there something cleaver I can on Unity?
>
> I just want to see if anyone else has come across this issue before?
>
>
> Sincerely,
> Thomas Dooley
> Cisco Telecommunications Administrator
> Triad NC
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<http://us.mc800.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<http://us.mc800.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100128/ae7c3473/attachment.html>