[cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI

[Dennis Heim]

It can be the same gateway... so it's a zero cost... other than a few cpu cycles and additional documentation.

Dennis Heim
Network Voice Engineer
CDW  Advanced Technology Services
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
Carmel, IN  46032

317.569.4255 Office
317.569.4201 Fax
317.694.6070 Cell
dennis.heim at cdw.com<mailto:dennis.heim at cdw.com>
www.berbee.com<http://www.berbee.com/>

From: Nate VanMaren [mailto:VanMarenNP at ldschurch.org]
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 4:07 PM
To: tmdvoip; Dennis Heim; 'John Huston'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI

No additional cost, just bouncing the call back to the same gateway.

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of tmdvoip
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 12:09 PM
To: 'Dennis Heim'; 'John Huston'; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI

Guys:

I think Dennis is right 'Translation patterns work on called number, not calling'. So an incoming call could not be blocked with the use of a Translation pattern.
BTW this client does have MGCP gateway.
I do not know if setting up an additional H.323 gateway for just blocking certain DN's would be a cost effective solution in this case. Let me check with the client and see if it is worth the additional fee to do the job.

Thanks, Tom

Sincerely,
Thomas Dooley
Cisco Telecommunications Administrator
Triad NC
Desk: 336-917-7125

________________________________
From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dennis Heim
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 11:01 AM
To: John Huston; cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI

Translation pattern do not work as he needs them to.  Translation patterns work on called number, not calling. You could leave your MGCP gateway in place, and when the hit CUCM they get sent to a h.323 gateway that does the CLID blocking and otherwise sends them back to CCM for complete processing. This is not the cleanest because you are sending it to another  or the same gateway but as H.323. But it does avoid having to convert your gateway from MGCP to H.323.

Dennis Heim
Network Voice Engineer
CDW  Advanced Technology Services
11711 N. Meridian Street, Suite 225
Carmel, IN  46032

317.569.4255 Office
317.569.4201 Fax
317.694.6070 Cell
dennis.heim at cdw.com<mailto:dennis.heim at cdw.com>
www.berbee.com<http://www.berbee.com/>

From: cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:cisco-voip-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of John Huston
Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:06 AM
To: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI

All you need to is build a translation pattern and then route to a null partition.  You can practice with your cell phone and then put in the actual number.



--- On Thu, 1/28/10, Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com<mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>> wrote:

From: Ryan Ratliff <rratliff at cisco.com<mailto:rratliff at cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: [cisco-voip] Can I Block in-coming calls PRI
To: "tmdvoip" <tmdvoip at gmail.com<mailto:tmdvoip at gmail.com>>
Cc: cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
Date: Thursday, January 28, 2010, 8:46 AM
If you are referring to blocking calls based on calling party number your provider can certainly assist with this.
CUCM cannot natively do it but your router can (if using H.323 between the gateway and CUCM).

Try searching google 'cucm block incoming call' and you will find many, many hits.

-Ryan

On Jan 28, 2010, at 9:40 AM, tmdvoip wrote:

Guys:

This is my configuration
CUCM 6.1.4 (2 CM's in cluster)
Cisco Unity 5.0.1 Exchange
NON-SIP
Cisco 2851 Routers

My client complains of harassing phone calls at one of their locations.
All the calls go to a single directory number; it would be nice if the
recipient of there calls would simply let the calls go to Voice Mail;
however this project has political ramifications. Also, the calls are
sometimes transferred from other users.

AT&T is the provider of the PRI's.

This is the Questions;

Does anyone know if AT&T can block at their end?
Is this something I can do relatively easy with CM Translation Patterns?
I there something cleaver I can on Unity?

I just want to see if anyone else has come across this issue before?


Sincerely,
Thomas Dooley
Cisco Telecommunications Administrator
Triad NC



_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<http://us.mc800.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip

_______________________________________________
cisco-voip mailing list
cisco-voip at puck.nether.net<http://us.mc800.mail.yahoo.com/mc/compose?to=cisco-voip@puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip




NOTICE: This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies of the original message.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100128/0dc22745/attachment.html>