[cisco-voip] Unity 5.x with Multiple Call Manager Clusters

[lelio at uoguelph.ca]

Good question. Not sure what takes precedence here. I know that you  
can configure ports for message notification so if you want  
notification to go out only one system, just configure those ports I'm  
guessing. That's what we've done. Now if you want message notification  
to go out the respective phone system, you'll have to test that out.  
Calls might go out the first available port though.

…
Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.

On 2010-07-12, at 4:20 PM, steve.siltman at assurant.com wrote:

> Wondering if this is true for message notification too.  An outbound  
> dial to notify the user that a message exists could use any  
> cluster?  I don't think I like where this is going.
>
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> From:        lelio at uoguelph.ca
> To:        "steve.siltman at assurant.com" <steve.siltman at assurant.com>
> Cc:        "cisco-voip at puck.nether.net" <cisco-voip at puck.nether.net>
> Date:        07/12/2010 03:15 PM
> Subject:        Re: [cisco-voip] Unity 5.x with Multiple Call  
> Manager Clusters
>
>
>
> I belive this is working by design, or at least with Unity 4.x it  
> is. There's no way to tell Unity on which cluster the phone is  
> registered. With Connection v7, you select the phone system the  
> subscriber belongs to in the first config screen. Not sure if they  
> added this option in Unity and/or in what version they did.
>
> …
> Don't look at me, my iPod maid that spilling mistake.
>
> On 2010-07-12, at 4:08 PM, steve.siltman at assurant.com wrote:
>
> I've got a cheesy question.
>
> While looking at the ports I see that when the MWI is set or  
> cancelled, it is sent to each cluster rather than the cluster where  
> the phone resides.  It's the same everytime, I see MWI set to  
> extension 28950 on port 120 and right when its finished it sends the  
> same to Port 144.  I have 3 different clusters connected to this  
> Unity pair.  Did I miss a routing configuration screen somewhere?
>
> It's not causing an issue but it bothers me.  Wasted port usage.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Steve This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it  
> may contain legally privileged and/or confidential information  
> intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of  
> this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified  
> that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding  
> or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly  
> prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please  
> notify the sender immediately and delete this message and all copies  
> and backups thereof. Thank you.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-voip mailing list
> cisco-voip at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-voip
> This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may  
> contain legally privileged and/or confidential information intended  
> solely for the use of the addressee(s). If the reader of this  
> message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that  
> any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, forwarding or  
> other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited.  
> If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender  
> immediately and delete this message and all copies and backups  
> thereof. Thank you.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-voip/attachments/20100712/125cc74b/attachment.html>